ArticlePeerJ2022
Significance of urine complement proteins in monitoring lupus activity.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary complement biomarkers in immune-mediated kidney diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Complement activation is a critical feature in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Whether there are changes of complement components in the urine of SLE has not been reported. The aim of the study was to evaluate the complement-related proteins in the urine of SLE, verify differentially expressed proteins(DEPs) in the active phase of SLE, further explore their clinical application value. Methods: First, we used bioinformatics and functional enrichment to screen and identify the urine protein profile of SLE patients. Then, analyzed and verified the proteins related to the complement pathway by western-blot and Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) technology. Further evaluated the relationship between urinary DEPs related to complement pathway and disease activity. Results: A total of 14 complement pathway-related proteins were screened for differences in expression between the active group and the stable group, eight of these DEPs were up-regulated and six were down-regulated. These DEPs may play a key role in SLE disease activity. We used PRM technology to verify the eight up-regulated proteins, and found that four of these complement proteins, namely C9, C8A, C4B, and C8G, were significantly increased in active group. Furthermore, these four DEPs were highly correlated with disease activity. In the urine of SLE patients, AUCs of 0.750, 0.840, 0.757 and 0.736 were achieved with C9, C8A, C4B, and C8G, respectively. Conclusions: Complement-related DEPs in urine have a certain correlation with SLE disease activity. Urine C9, C8A, C4B and C8G present promising non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring lupus activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.