Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420103›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of burns and trauma2022

Burns incident responses worldwide and the role of burn speciality teams: a review.

Laura Awad, Keith Allison

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of burns and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura AwadDepartment of Plastic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, United Kingdom.
Keith AllisonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, United Kingdom.
James Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMass casualty incidents (MCIs) have a profound impact on health care systems worldwide. Following recent incidents within the United Kingdom (UK), notably terrorist attacks in Manchester and the Grenfell Tower fire in London, there has been a renewed interest in how the UK would cope with a burn MCI. A Burns Incidence Response Team (BIRT) is a new development incorporated into the Burn Annex of the NHS England National Concept of Operation for Managing Mass Casualties. It is a mobile advice team of healthcare professionals with burns expertise who can support the subsequent management of an MCI, and triage effectively. This review assesses the response to disasters worldwide, detailing national structure, and in particular the involvement of burn specialist teams. This review aims to highlight the roles of burns specialists, and their role within the UK.

methodA review of Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, UK government reports, annexes and textbooks was conducted.

resultsA search resulted in 826 sources; 42 articles were included in this review, with 9 additional sources. BIRTs are described in the NHS Guideline Concept of Operations for the Management of Mass Casualties: Burns Annex, published September 2020.

conclusionsThe implementation of a national burn response plan is a necessary step forward for effective management of these continuing MCIs. The available literature supports the need for preparation and organized response with a centralized control. Increased awareness and understanding of the role of BIRTs is important and highlights the need for specialist input in the long and short term. Factors which may affect the implementation of BIRT's need to be explored in further detail.

Indexed as

burns disasterBurns response teamsmass casualty incidents

Identifiers

PMID36420103
PMCPMC9677225
OpenAlexW4310332812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.