ArticleCureus2022
The Effect of Adding Procalcitonin to the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (Sirs) and Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Scoring System in Predicting Sepsis Mortality.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to determine if the addition of procalcitonin to the existing systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring systems could improve the predictability of in-hospital sepsis-related mortality. Secondarily, we sought to determine if the addition of procalcitonin could predict the likelihood of ICU admission and discharge home.
designThis is a retrospective, single-center, observational study that looked at data from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2019. Patients were stratified into four groups: SIRS-positive + procalcitonin >2 ng/mL (pSIRS+), SIRS-positive + procalcitonin ≤2 ng/mL (pSIRS-), qSOFA-positive + procalcitonin >2 ng/mL (pqSOFA+), and qSOFA-positive + procalcitonin ≤2 ng/mL (pqSOFA-).
settingThe study was conducted at a community hospital in Las Vegas, Nevada. PATIENTS: Patients were included in the study if they were >18 years of age and had hospital admission diagnosis of sepsis with at least one value of procalcitonin level.
interventionsAfter patients which met the inclusion criteria, patients were divided into subgroups of SIRS, SIRS + procalcitonin > 2 ng/mL, qSOFA, qSOFA + procalcitonin >2 ng/mL. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were ICU admission, length of stay, and discharge to home.
results933 patients were included in the study with an overall mortality rate of 21.22%, an overall ICU admission rate of 56.15%, and an overall discharge home rate of 29.58%. In those identified with a sepsis-related diagnosis code, pSIRS+ predicted an in-hospital mortality rate of 31.89% compared to pSIRS- 16.15% (P < 0.0001). In regards to qSOFA, the addition of procalcitonin added no statistically significant difference in predicting in-hospital mortality. pSIRS+ patients were found to have an ICU admission rate of 76.16% and a discharge home rate of 19.20% compared to pSIRS- who had 47.40% and 34.90%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Like in our primary outcome, our data for qSOFA was not statistically significant.
conclusionsProcalcitonin added utility to the SIRS scoring system in predicting sepsis-related in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and discharge home. Procalcitonin did not add statistically significant benefit to the qSOFA scoring system in predicting sepsis-related in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and discharge home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.