Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420041›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2022

Exogenous nitric oxide promotes salinity tolerance in plants: A meta-analysis.

Md Tahjib-Ul-Arif, Xiangying Wei, Israt Jahan, Md Hasanuzzaman, Zahid Hasan Sabuj, Faisal Zulfiqar, Jianjun Chen, Rashid Iqbal, Khondoker M G Dastogeer, Abdullah Al Mamun Sohag and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Promotion of CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Special Issue "Nitric Oxide Signaling in Plants".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Learning fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Md Tahjib-Ul-ArifPlant Biology and Biofunctional Chemistry Lab, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Xiangying WeiInstitute of Oceanography, College of Geography and Oceanography, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China.
Israt JahanDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Md HasanuzzamanDepartment of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Zahid Hasan SabujBreeding Division, Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute, Pabna, Bangladesh.
Faisal ZulfiqarDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Jianjun ChenEnvironmental Horticulture Department and Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Apopka, FL, United States.
Rashid IqbalDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Khondoker M G DastogeerDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al Mamun SohagPlant Biology and Biofunctional Chemistry Lab, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Sadia Haque TonnyPlant Biology and Biofunctional Chemistry Lab, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Imran HamidFaculty of Animal Husbandry, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Ibrahim Al-AshkarDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohsen MirzapourFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Ayman El SabaghDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Yoshiyuki MurataGraduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Bangladesh Agricultural University · BDIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKAl-Azhar University · EGBangladesh Sugarcrop Research InstituteKafrelsheikh University · EGMinjiang University · CNOkayama University · JPSiirt Üniversitesi · TRUniversity of Florida · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) has received much attention since it can boost plant defense mechanisms, and plenty of studies have shown that exogenous NO improves salinity tolerance in plants. However, because of the wide range of experimental settings, it is difficult to assess the administration of optimal dosages, frequency, timing, and method of application and the overall favorable effects of NO on growth and yield improvements. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to reveal the exact physiological and biochemical mechanisms and to understand the influence of plant-related or method-related factors on NO-mediated salt tolerance. Exogenous application of NO significantly influenced biomass accumulation, growth, and yield irrespective of salinity stress. According to this analysis, seed priming and foliar pre-treatment were the most effective methods of NO application to plants. Moreover, one-time and regular intervals of NO treatment were more beneficial for plant growth. The optimum concentration of NO ranges from 0.1 to 0.2 mM, and it alleviates salinity stress up to 150 mM NaCl. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of NO treatment was more pronounced as salinity stress was prolonged (>21 days). This meta-analysis showed that NO supplementation was significantly applicable at germination and seedling stages. Interestingly, exogenous NO treatment boosted plant growth most efficiently in dicots. This meta-analysis showed that exogenous NO alleviates salt-induced oxidative damage and improves plant growth and yield potential by regulating osmotic balance, mineral homeostasis, photosynthetic machinery, the metabolism of reactive oxygen species, and the antioxidant defense mechanism. Our analysis pointed out several research gaps, such as lipid metabolism regulation, reproductive stage performance, C4 plant responses, field-level yield impact, and economic profitability of farmers in response to exogenous NO, which need to be evaluated in the subsequent investigation.

Indexed as

abiotic stressantioxidantsNO, photosynthesisoxidative stressplant growthsalt stress

Identifiers

PMID36420041
PMCPMC9676926
OpenAlexW4308448332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.