ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Magnitude of NNM and associated factors among Newborns delivered at the North Shewa zone Public Health Hospital, Central Ethiopia: A multi-level analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal near miss refers to a condition where a newborn is close to death within the first 28 days of life but ultimately survives either by chance or because of the quality of care they received. It is considered a major public health problem that contributes to the global burden of disease in less developing countries. For every death due to NMM, many others develop a severe complication. Despite this grim reality, there seems to be a gap in terms of the magnitude of and predictors of NNM in Ethiopia, where the previous study focused on neonatal death investigation. This study aimed to determine the magnitude of NNM and its determinants among the neonates delivered in the North Shewa zone, Central Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a systematic random sampling technique among 747 newly delivered babies in the North Shewa zone public hospital from January 30 to June 30, 2021. Neonatal near misses were identified with the help of the World Health Organization labeling criteria. Collected data were coded, entered, and cleaned by using Epi data 4.4.6 and analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to compute summary statistics and proportions. Variables at a cutoff value of 0.25 on bivariate and 0.05 on multivariate logistic regression were used to identify predictors. Result: The prevalence of NNM was 35.3% (95% CI = 31.9-38.6) per 1,000 live births. Participant occupation [AOR: 0.55, CI: 0.33-0.90], marital status [AOR: 2.19; CI: 1.06-4.51], instrumental delivery [AOR: 1.98; CI: 1.10-3.55], intrapartum hemorrhage [AOR: 2.27; CI: 1.03-5.01], abortion history [AOR: 1.59; CI: 1.03-2.44], mal-presentation [AOR: 1.77; CI: 1.14-2.77], premature rupture of membrane [AOR: 2.36; CI: 1.59-3.51], and pregnancy-related infection [AOR: 1.99; CI: 1.14-3.46] were found to have statistically significant association. Conclusion and recommendation: One-third of neonates face serious neonatal health conditions. Given this, addressing modifiable obstetric risk factors through providing skilled and quality care to mothers during pregnancy and during and after childbirth was important for improving neonatal health. Additionally, strengthening antenatal care services to minimize the infection occurring during pregnancy through the provision of appropriate services and counseling about the consequences of abortion was essential in reversing the problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.