ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Clustering patterns of metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study in children and adolescents in Kyiv.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim: to identify subgroups by cluster analysis according parameters: original homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-1 IR), updated computer model of insulin resistance (HOMA-2 IR), β-cell function (%B) and insulin sensitivity (%S) for the prognosis of different variants of metabolic syndrome in children for more individualized treatment selection. Patients and methods: The observational cross-sectional study on 75 children aged from 10 to 17 with metabolic syndrome according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria was conducted at the Cardiology Department of Children's Clinical Hospital No.6 in Kyiv. HOMA-1 IR was calculated as follows: fasting insulin (µIU/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5. HOMA-2 IR with %B and %S were calculated according to the computer model in [http://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk]. All biochemical analysis were carried out using Cobas 6000 analyzer and Roche Diagnostics (Switzerland). The statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 7.0 and Easy R. The hierarchical method Ward was used for cluster analysis according the parameters: HOMA-1 IR, HOMA-2 IR, %B and %S. Results: Four clusters were identified from the dendrogram, which could predict four variants in the course of metabolic syndrome such that children in cluster 1 would have the worst values of the studied parameters and those in cluster 4 - the best. It was found that HOMA-1 IR was much higher in cluster 1 (6.32 ± 0.66) than in cluster 4 (2.19 ± 0.13). HOMA-2 IR was also much higher in cluster 1 (3.80 ± 0.34) than in cluster 4 (1.31 ± 0.06). By the analysis of variance using Scheffe's multiple comparison method, a statistically significant difference was obtained between the laboratory parameters among the subgroups: HOMA-1 IR ( Conclusions: A cluster analysis revealed that the first two subgroups of children had the worst insulin resistance and lipid profile parameters. It was found positive correlation between HOMA-1 IR, HOMA-2 IR, %B and %S with lipid metabolism parameters TG and VLDL-C and negative correlation between %B and HDL-C in children with metabolic syndrome (MetS).The risk of getting a high TG result in the blood analysis in children with MetS was significantly dependent with the HOMA-2 IR >2.26.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.