Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Efficacy and toxicity of Ipilimumab-Nivolumab combination therapy in elderly metastatic melanoma patients.

Ronen Stoff, Shirly Grynberg, Nethanel Asher, Shachar Laks, Yael Steinberg, Jacob Schachter, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Guy Ben-Betzalel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronen StoffElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shirly GrynbergElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Nethanel AsherElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shachar LaksSurgical Division, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yael SteinbergElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Jacob SchachterElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ronnie Shapira-FrommerElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Guy Ben-BetzalelElla Lemelbaum Institute of Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized metastatic Melanoma therapy. The most active regimen is combination therapy of Ipilimumab-Nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo) with response rates (RR) of ~60% and median overall survival (OS) of ~6 years. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) are common (~60% develop grade 3-4) and pose a challenge when treating frail patients. We sought to examine whether Ipi-Nivo therapy is feasible in elderly metastatic melanoma patients. Methods: Electronic records of patients treated at the Ella Lemelbaum Institute with Ipi-Nivo between the years 2017-2021 were screened for age. Elderly patients were defined as age 75 and older (group A) and were matched with records of patients age <75 (group B). Records were analyzed for baseline parameters, immunotherapy regimen, RR, toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Twenty-six relevant patients age >75 (median 77) were identified and were matched to 34 younger patients (median age 57). No statistically significant differences were noted in terms of baseline parameters except for BRAF mutation status (group A 15%, group B 47%, p=0.008). Response rate in group A was 38% and is consistent with previously published data. Median PFS was the same for both groups (A = 5.5 months, B= 7.5 months, p=NS). Treatment was similarly tolerated: 35% of group A patients completed 4 cycles of therapy compared to 28% for group B (p=NS). Grade 2-4 irAE were the same (A=58%, B=66%, p=NS) and there was no difference in the need for hospitalization for G3-4 events between the groups. (A=63%, B=69%, p=NS). Further division into 4 age groups (>80 vs 75-79 in group A and 65-74 vs <65 in group B) found no difference in terms of response rate or G3-4 toxicity. Conclusion: Ipilimumab-Nivolumab combination therapy in elderly metastatic Melanoma patients seems to be well tolerated and efficient in selected elderly patients based on performance status and comorbidities, just as in younger patients. This regimen seems to be a feasible treatment option for this age group.

Indexed as

anti CTLA-4anti PD-1geriatric oncologyimmunotherapymelanoma

Identifiers

PMID36419899
PMCPMC9676931
OpenAlexW4308448747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.