ArticleiScience2022
Decrease in signal-related activity by visual training and repetitive visual stimulation.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency-dependent photic modulation of wakeful consolidation in visual learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Repetitive Sensory Stimulation Potentiates and Recruits Sensory-Evoked Cortical Population Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cortical excitability in human somatosensory and visual cortex: implications for plasticity and learning - a minireview.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
While principles governing encoding mechanisms in visual perceptual learning (VPL) are well-known, findings regarding posttraining processing are still unrelated in terms of their underlying mechanisms. Here, we examined the effect of repetitive high-frequency visual stimulation (H-RVS) on VPL in an orientation detection task. Application of H-RVS after a single task session led to enhanced orientation detection performance (n = 12), but not in a sham condition (n = 12). If prior training-based VPL had been established by seven sessions in the detection task, H-RVS instead led to a performance impairment (n = 12). Both sham (n = 8) and low-frequency stimulation (L-RVS, n = 12) did not lead to a significant impairment. These findings may suggest reversal dynamics in which conditions of elevated network excitation lead to a decrease in a signal-related activity instead of a further increase. These reversal dynamics may represent a means to link various findings regarding posttraining processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.