SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022
MicroRNA panels as diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Potential of Cross-Specimen microRNA Panels as Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Exosomes in Colorectal Cancer: From Tumor Biology to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The Preliminary Study for the Trial of Using Selected miRNAs for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Background-Free Nanopore Decoding of microRNA Expression Patterns Using Circular Diagnostic DNA.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Alterations in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer.Epigenomes · 2026Review
- Sepsis Biomarkers in Evolution: Comparative Insights and the Promising Roles of MDW and Presepsin.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Proteomic analysis revealed the potential usefulness of faecal extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation of the β-catenin pathway in cadmium-induced colorectal cancer progression and chemoresistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Blood-Based miRNA Panels for Timely Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Identification of clinical and pathological risk factors for lymph-node metastasis in T1 stage colon cancer: a population-based study.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- MicroRNAs in colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of circulating and tissue microRNA levels.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Expression Analysis of miR-519a-3p and miR-379-5p in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Combined Experimental and Bioinformatic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prognostic Role of Circulating miR-141 in Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Targeting Regulatory Noncoding RNAs in Human Cancer: The State of the Art in Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Metabolic and immune heterogeneity in stroke: Insights into subtype identification and biomarker discovery.PloS one · 2025Article
- miR-200 family as new potential prognostic factor of overall survival of patients with WHO G2 and WHO G3 brain gliomas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Role of microRNA-155 as a Biomarker in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Advances in microRNAs as Emerging Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Serum small RNAs in metastatic colorectal cancer predict response to chemotherapy and characterize high-risk patients.Molecular cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) have emerged as promising diagnostic biomarkers for several diseases, including cancer. However, the diagnostic accuracy of miRNA panels in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains inconsistent and there is still lack of meta-analyses to determine whether miRNA panels can serve as robust biomarkers for CRC diagnosis. Methods: This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical utility of miRNA panels as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC. The investigation systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (21-year span, between 2000 and 2021) to retrieve articles reporting the diagnostic role of miRNA panels in detecting CRC. Diagnostic meta-analysis of miRNA panels used diverse evaluation indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR), Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR), Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) values. Results: Among the 313 articles identified, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of miRNA panels for the diagnosis of CRC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.86), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.80), 4.06 (95% CI: 3.89-4.23), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.19-0.20), 22.50 (95% CI: 20.81-24.32) for sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR, respectively. Moreover, the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve revealed an AUC value of 0.915 (95% CI: 0.914-0.916), suggesting an outstanding diagnostic accuracy for overall miRNA panels. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses demonstrated that miRNA panels have the highest diagnostic accuracy within serum samples, rather than in other sample-types - with a sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of 0.87, 0.86, 7.33, 0.13, 55.29, and 0.943, respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed that DOR values did not differ markedly, which indicates that the meta-analysis had strong reliability. Furthermore, this study demonstrated no proof of publication bias for DOR values analyzed using Egger's regression test ( Conclusion: This study's findings indicated that miRNA panels, particularly serum-derived miRNA panels, can serve as powerful and promising biomarkers for early CRC screening. Systematic review registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021268172].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.