Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419776›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2022

Do users of long-acting reversible contraceptives receive the same counseling content as other modern method users? A cross-sectional, multi-country analysis of women's experiences with the Method Information Index in six sub-Saharan African countries.

Brooke W Bullington, Katherine Tumlinson, Celia Karp, Leigh Senderowicz, Linnea Zimmerman, Pierre Z Akilimali, Musa Sani Zakirai, Funmilola M OlaOlorun, Simon P S Kibira, Frederick Edward Makumbi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Brooke W BullingtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapell Hill, Chapel Hill United States of America.
Katherine TumlinsonCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill United States of America.
Celia KarpDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore United States.
Leigh SenderowiczDepartments of Gender and Women's Studies and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison United States.
Linnea ZimmermanDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore United States.
Pierre Z AkilimaliKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Musa Sani ZakiraiNational Population Commission, Abuja, Nigeria.
Funmilola M OlaOlorunCollege of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Simon P S KibiraDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kimpala, Uganda.
Frederick Edward MakumbiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kimpala, Uganda.
Solomon ShiferawDepartment of Reproductive and Health Services Management, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
PMA Principal Investigators Group
Johns Hopkins University · USMakerere University · UGUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAddis Ababa University · ETNational Universities Commission · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NGUniversity of Kinshasa · CDUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There has been a growing focus on informed choice in contraceptive research. Because removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including implants and IUDs, requires a trained provider, ensuring informed choice in the adoption of these methods is imperative. We sought to understand whether information received during contraceptive counseling differed among women using LARC and those using other modern methods of contraception. Study Design: We used cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda collected in 2019-2020 by the Performance Monitoring for Action project. We included 7969 reproductive-aged women who reported use of modern contraception. Our outcome of interest, information received during contraceptive counseling, was measured using a binary indicator of whether respondents answered "yes" to all 4 questions that make up the Method Information Index Plus (MII+). We used modified Poisson models to estimate the prevalence ratio between method type (LARC vs. other modern methods) and the MII+, controlling for individual- and facility-level covariates. Results: Reported receipt of the full MII+ during contraceptive counseling ranged from 21% in the DRC to 51% in Kenya. In all countries, a higher proportion of LARC users received the MII+ compared to other modern method users. A greater proportion of LARC users answered "yes" to all questions that make up the MII+ at the time of counseling compared to other modern method users in DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting the full MII+ between users of LARC and other modern methods in Burkina Faso (Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.48) and Côte d'Ivoire (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.45). Conclusion: Information received during contraceptive counseling was limited for all modern contraceptive users. LARC users had significantly higher prevalence of receiving the MII+ compared to other modern method users in the DRC, Kenya, and Uganda. Family planning programs should ensure that all women receive complete, unbiased contraceptive counseling. Implications: Across 6 sub-Saharan African countries, a substantial proportion reproductive-aged women using contraception did not report receiving comprehensive counseling when they received their method. Women using long-acting reversible contraception received more information compared to women using other modern methods in the DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda after controlling for individual- and facility-level factors.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFamily planningInformed choiceLong-acting reversible contraception

Identifiers

PMID36419776
PMCPMC9676194
OpenAlexW4308930211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.