Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419584›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2022

Validating a Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence Measure in the Context of Multiple Chronic Diseases and Routes of Medication Administration Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Corrine I Voils, Kara L Gavin, Carolyn T Thorpe, Samantha K Pabich, Bryce B Reeve, Ghazan J Mian, Aaron Faacks, Ian M Kronish

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07397260 (Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07397260 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,304ConditionsHypertension (HTN)ArmsSelf report of home measured blood pressure via patient EHR portal, Automated feedback about home blood pressure results, Automated Transmission of Remotely Measured Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corrine I VoilsWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-663X
Kara L GavinUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Carolyn T ThorpeVeterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Samantha K PabichWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Bryce B ReeveDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Ghazan J MianUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8603-6965
Aaron FaacksUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-7385
Ian M KronishColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0945-2380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with diabetes may take oral and injectable medications and often have comorbid chronic diseases. It is unclear whether to assess nonadherence for oral and injectable medications separately or combined and for comorbid conditions separately or combined. Research Design and Methods: We conducted two cognitive interview studies among patients with type 2 diabetes who were prescribed medications for oral or injectable diabetes medications (Study 1) or at least one diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol medication (Study 2). Participants completed the two-domain DOSE-Nonadherence measure, which assesses extent of nonadherence and reasons for nonadherence. We asked about interpretation of instructions and items, recall period, ability to respond accurately with separate versus combined versions, and comprehensiveness of reasons for nonadherence to injectable medications. Results: Based on Study 1 (n=14), nonadherence to injectable and oral medications should be assessed separately. Participants believe they can respond accurately to 7-day recall period for daily medications and a one-month recall period for weekly injectable medications. New reasons for nonadherence to injectable medications were perceived as relevant. Based on Study 2 (n-12), nonadherence to medications for diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol should be assessed separately. Conclusion: Although separate versions increase response time, it may improve accuracy. Responses to the measure can facilitate conversations about nonadherence between providers and patients to inform clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

cognitive interviewdiabetesmedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID36419584
PMCPMC9677928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.