ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Real-World Use of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5%/Tobramycin 0.3% Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammatory Conditions.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Use of a combination corticosteroid/antibiotic product is common in ocular surface inflammatory conditions for which corticosteroid therapy is indicated and there exists a risk of superficial bacterial infection. Combination loteprednol etabonate 0.5% and tobramycin 0.3% (LE/T) has been evaluated for blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in two trials, but there has been limited reporting on its real-world use. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at three optometry practices in the USA. Data were collected from cases in which LE/T was used and data were recorded for the period commencing with therapy with a minimum of one follow-up visit (within 2 months). Data abstracted included patient demographics, diagnosis, LE/T dosing regimen, pre- and post-treatment ocular signs and symptoms, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, adverse event (AE) reports, visual acuity (VA), and any notations as to resolution of baseline condition. Primary outcomes of interest included IOP changes and AEs. Results: Ninety-six patient charts were extracted, and data from 87 charts (115 LE/T-treated eyes) were included. Mean (SD) years of age was 45.6 (19.7), most patients were white (83.9%), and just over half were female (58.6%). Common baseline conditions were conjunctival injury/corneal abrasion (25.3%), keratitis (18.4%), viral conjunctivitis (16.1%), and blepharitis/eyelid inflammation/MGD (11.5%). The most common LE/T dosing regimen was one drop QID. Mean (SD) IOP was 15.2 (4.4) mm Hg at baseline and 15.7 (4.4) mm Hg at the first follow-up visit (p = 0.2467). No AEs were recorded, and there were no significant changes in mean VA. Where recorded, most patients (83%) were noted as having their condition resolved/resolving at the first or second follow-up visit. Conclusion: LE/T appears to have a high level of safety when used for the management of various ocular surface inflammatory conditions encountered in optometric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.