Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419530›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Feasibility of gabapentin as an intervention for neurorecovery after an acute spinal cord injury: Protocol.

James R Wilson, Samuel Doty, Jordan C Petitt, Mohamed El-Abtah, John J Francis, Megan G Sharpe, Michael L Kelly, Kim D Anderson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05302999 (Feasibility of Early Gabapentin as an Intervention for Neurorecovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05302999 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Feasibility of Early Gabapentin as an Intervention for Neurorecovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorMetroHealth Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsGabapentin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James R WilsonMetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Samuel DotyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Jordan C PetittDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Mohamed El-AbtahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
John J FrancisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Megan G SharpeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Michael L KellyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Kim D AndersonMetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Case Western Reserve University · USMetroHealth · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This protocol is describing the first ever prospective, mock-efficacy, dose exploration trial design testing the feasibility of administering gabapentin in the acute setting as an intervention for neurorecovery. Gabapentin is an FDA-approved medication for treating seizures and postherpetic neuralgia and is used broadly off-label for neuropathic pain management for many conditions, including spinal cord injury. Emerging data suggests that when given early after spinal cord injury onset and in low-medium doses, gabapentin may have properties that promote recovery of neurological function. The objective of this trial is to assess the feasibility of conducting an efficacy trial in which gabapentin is started early after injury, is restricted in its dose, and is not used for pain management. Methods and analysis: Forty-two people aged 18 years or older with any level and any severity of spinal cord injury induced by a trauma will be enrolled, randomized, and have the first dose of study medication by 120 h post-injury onset. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 600, 1,800 mg/day gabapentin, or placebo. Study medication will be given for a 90-day duration. Blinded assessments will be obtained at 7 days post-injury (baseline), 30 days post-injury (interim), after the 90-day treatment duration/approximately 3 months post-injury (end of treatment), and at 6 months post-injury (end of study). The key analysis parameters will evaluate feasibility of recruitment of target population, delivery of drug treatment protocol, maintenance of blinding, and retention of participants. Discussion: Outputs from this trial will inform research and clinical practice on the effects of manipulating gabapentin for non-pain management purposes in the acute setting and will guide the development of a properly powered efficacy trial of gabapentin as an intervention for neurorecovery in spinal cord injury. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the MetroHealth Institutional Review Board (IRB21-00609) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov prior to enrolling any participants. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, presentations at professional conferences and in the community, and through other healthcare and public venues. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05302999; protocol version 1.1 approved 05/23/2022. Trial funding: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research.

Indexed as

dose explorationgabapentinneurorecoveryspinal cord injurytraumatic

Identifiers

PMID36419530
PMCPMC9676350
OpenAlexW4308449940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.