Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419498›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Multicolor flow cytometry on pericardial effusion for a prompt diagnosis and treatment of hematological malignancies with heart involvement.

Luigi Cappannoli, Massimo Imazio, Stefan Hohaus, Gianluigi Saponara, Domenico D'Amario, Silvia Bellesi, Elena Maiolo, Marcello Viscovo, Federica Fatone, Eleonora Alma and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi CappannoliDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Rome, Italy.
Massimo ImazioCardiology, Department of Cardiothoracic, University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", ASUFC, Udine, Italy.
Stefan HohausDepartment of Imaging Diagnostic, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gianluigi SaponaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Domenico D'AmarioDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Rome, Italy.
Silvia BellesiDepartment of Imaging Diagnostic, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elena MaioloDepartment of Imaging Diagnostic, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marcello ViscovoDepartment of Imaging Diagnostic, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Federica FatoneDepartment of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora AlmaDepartment of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesco D'AlòDepartment of Imaging Diagnostic, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Filippo CreaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Rome, Italy.
Tommaso SannaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malignancies represent 15-50% of total causes of pericardial effusions (PE). Routine analyses recommended to be performed on pericardial fluid include general chemistry, cytology, polymerase chain reaction, and microbiological cultures. Multicolor flow cytometry (FC) is a laboratory test that already proved to be useful in the detection of lymphoproliferative and metastatic malignancies in pleural and peritoneal effusions, but current guidelines do not mention its use on PE to reach a diagnosis. Methods: Our institutional protocol foresees to routinely perform a multicolor FC analysis on pericardial fluid samples obtained by pericardiocentesis, in addition to other guidelines-recommended analyses. A sample of 15-30 ml is analyzed using a lyse and wash staining method using combination panels of antibodies, allowing to detect specific cellular subpopulations, analyzing tens to hundreds of thousands of cells in few seconds. The present manuscript aims to report our single-center experience with this diagnostic tool in patients presenting with PE requiring pericardiocentesis. Results: Routine use of multicolor FC on pericardial fluid samples in our institution allowed to reach a definite diagnosis of cardiac lymphomas in two patients presenting with otherwise unexplained severe PE. This resulted in immediate start of combined immunotherapy, with patients' clinical improvement. At 6 months follow-up both patients are alive and presented a complete disease regression. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence from routine use of multicolor FC on PE support that this is a promising tool to reach a rapid diagnosis of hematological malignancies with heart involvement, leading to a prompt initiation of targeted therapies.

Indexed as

cardiac lymphomaflow cytometry—methodsguidelinesheart failuremalignanciespericardial effusion

Identifiers

PMID36419498
PMCPMC9676641
OpenAlexW4308440436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.