Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419362›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental dental research2023

Validation of the French version of the ICHOM adult oral health standard set.

Alba Nicolas-Boluda, Stephane Simon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alba Nicolas-BoludaDepartment of Research, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3029-8755
Stephane SimonUniversité de Paris, UFR d'Odontologie, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 6 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ICHOM Adult Oral Health Standard Set (AOHSS) recently developed by the ICHOM Oral Adult Health Working Group is a standard set of outcomes designed for its collection in clinical practice in dental health. The outcome standard set is made up of clinical-reported outcome measures (CROMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PROM section of the Standard Set in French for France to enable comprehensive evaluation of the patients' oral health quality of life in a French population.

methodsThe questionnaire was translated following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research (ISPOR). We included patients consulting in a dentistry clinic (n = 127) and seeking dental care. The PROM and CROM data were collected from all patients. Both reliability and the internal consistency were evaluated.

resultsThe ICHOM AOHSS was successfully translated into French. We sampled and surveyed 126 patients in a dentistry clinic in France using the French translation of the ICHOM AOHSS. Cronbach's α was calculated to measure the internal consistency. The resulting Cronbach's α was 0.8, indicating acceptable homogeneity.

conclusionsThe French version of the ICHOM AOHSS shows acceptable psychometric properties in terms of reliability and internal consistency. This translation is suitable for its implementation in a French-speaking patient population.

Indexed as

Oral HealthQuality of LifeAdultHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesoral healthpatient-reported outcome measuresquality of lifevalue-based health care

Identifiers

PMID36419362
PMCPMC9932232
OpenAlexW4309915644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.