Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419359›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Using an animal model to predict the effective human dose for oral multiple sclerosis drugs.

Wei Liu, Zhiheng Yu, Ziyu Wang, Emmanuelle L Waubant, Suodi Zhai, Leslie Z Benet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve ameliorates inflammation and disease activity in a rat EAE model of multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiheng YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ziyu WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Emmanuelle L WaubantWeill Institute for Neurosciences and San Francisco Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Suodi ZhaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Leslie Z BenetDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9678-2371
University of California, San Francisco · USChina Pharmaceutical University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the potential usefulness of an animal model to predict the appropriate dose of newly developed drugs for treating relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Conversion of the lowest effective dose (LEffD) for mice and rats in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model was used to predict the human effective dose utilizing the body surface area correction factor found in the 2005 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry in selecting safe starting doses for clinical trials. Predictions were also tested by comparison with doses estimated by scaling up the LEffD in the model by the human to animal clearance ratio. Although initial proof-of-concept studies of oral fingolimod tested the efficacy and safety of 1.25 and 5 mg in treating RRMS, the EAE animal model predicted the approved dose of this drug, 0.5 mg daily. This approach would have also provided useful predictions of the approved human oral doses for cladribine, dimethyl fumarate, ozanimod, ponesimod, siponimod, and teriflunomide, drugs developed with more than one supposed mechanism of action. The procedure was not useful for i.v. dosed drugs, including monoclonal antibodies. We maintain that drug development scientists should always examine a simple allometric method to predict the therapeutic effective dose in humans. Then, following clinical studies, we believe that the animal model might be expected to yield useful predictions of other drugs developed to treat the same condition. The methodology may not always be predictive, but the approach is so simple it should be investigated.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAnimalsDimethyl FumarateFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMiceRatsDimethyl FumarateFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID36419359
PMCPMC10014696
OpenAlexW4309862463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.