Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419226›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2023

Student academic performance in non-lecture physiology topics following the abrupt change from traditional on-site teaching to online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic.

Pachara Varachotisate, Natakorn Siritaweechai, Weerapat Kositanurit, Sekh Thanprasertsuk, Maneerat Chayanupatkul, Thana Thongsricome, Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Nipat Chuleerarux, Pasakorn Watanatada, Duangporn Werawatganon and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Science and Videogames: From Scientific Dissemination to Knowledge Production.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Pachara VarachotisateDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-4669
Natakorn SiritaweechaiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-1523
Weerapat KositanuritDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-7800
Sekh ThanprasertsukDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0267-1372
Maneerat ChayanupatkulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1649-5373
Thana ThongsricomeDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-4273
Thanapob BumphenkiatikulDivision of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3311-8040
Nipat ChuleeraruxDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9474-637X
Pasakorn WatanatadaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1130-6297
Duangporn WerawatganonDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-9690
Juraiporn SomboonwongDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8107-4559
Prasong SiriviriyakulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3634-4158
Sompol SanguanrungsirikulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-4540
Saknan Bongsebandhu-PhubhakdiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-3568
Varis RatanasirisawadDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7009-3482
Aunchalee JaroenlapnopparatDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6716-5967
Chuti BuranaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-1545
Pornpavee SomsirivattanaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Onanong KulaputanaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-7127
Kasiphak KaikaewDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1790-1839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-clerkship medical education, including all physiology classes, was obliged to change to online teaching due to limitations of on-site (face-to-face) classes. However, the effectiveness of online teaching in non-lecture physiology topics during the COVID-19 pandemic has not been thoroughly investigated.

methodWe conducted a prospective study to evaluate the students' academic achievement and opinions on online teaching during the COVID-19 academic year. Academic achievement of 312 students in the COVID-19 year was compared with that of 299 students in the pre-COVID-19 year. Student opinions regarding social interactions and the preferred learning method were also collected.

resultsWe found that student academic achievement in the non-lecture physiology topics, assessed by summative scores, was 4.80±0.92 percent higher in the pre-COVID-19 year than in the COVID-19 year (P < 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.42). Students rated that online classes tended to reduce their interactions with peers and teachers; however, students preferred online learning over traditional on-site learning.

conclusionsThis study pointed out that students' academic performance related to the physiology topics taught by online non-lecture methods during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower than their performance when the topics were taught by the traditional (on-site) methods, although students reported that they preferred the online teaching. Hence, we suggest that medical teachers should deliberately plan and utilise a variety of tools and techniques when developing online non-lecture classes to preserve the interactivity of the classes, which might overcome this gap in students' academic performance.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceCOVID-19Education, DistanceStudents, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesAcademic performanceCOVID-19non-lecture based teachingonline learningphysiologypre-clerkship educationstudent opinionundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID36419226
PMCPMC9704068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.