Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419146›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

The socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on children and adolescents: a scoping review and conceptual framework.

S Atkins, L Heimo, D J Carter, M Ribas Closa, L Vanleeuw, L Chenciner, P Wambi, K Sidney-Annerstedt, U Egere, S Verkuijl and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Perspectives from the 2IJTLD open · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

S AtkinsWHO Collaborating Centre On Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. salla.atkins@tuni.fi.
L HeimoFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
D J CarterFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
M Ribas ClosaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
L VanleeuwFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
L ChencinerRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
P WambiUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
K Sidney-AnnerstedtWHO Collaborating Centre On Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
U EgereDepartments of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
S VerkuijlWHO Global Tuberculosis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
A BrandsWHO Global Tuberculosis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
T MasiniWHO Global Tuberculosis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
K VineyWHO Global Tuberculosis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
T WingfieldWHO Collaborating Centre On Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
K LönnrothWHO Collaborating Centre On Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
D BocciaFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Karolinska Institutet · SEWorld Health Organization · CHTampere University · FIFaculty of Public Health · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V004832/1Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) has been repeatedly shown to have socioeconomic impacts in both individual-level and ecological studies; however, much less is known about this effect among children and adolescents and the extent to which being affected by TB during childhood and adolescence can have life-course implications. This paper describes the results of the development of a conceptual framework and scoping review to review the evidence on the short- and long-term socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on children and adolescents.

objectivesTo increase knowledge of the socioeconomic impact of TB on children and adolescents.

methodsWe developed a conceptual framework of the socioeconomic impact of TB on children and adolescents, and used scoping review methods to search for evidence supporting or disproving it. We searched four academic databases from 1 January 1990 to 6 April 2021 and conducted targeted searches of grey literature. We extracted data using a standard form and analysed data thematically.

resultsThirty-six studies (29 qualitative, five quantitative and two mixed methods studies) were included in the review. Overall, the evidence supported the conceptual framework, suggesting a severe socioeconomic impact of TB on children and adolescents through all the postulated pathways. Effects ranged from impoverishment, stigma, and family separation, to effects on nutrition and missed education opportunities. TB did not seem to exert a different socioeconomic impact when directly or indirectly affecting children/adolescents, suggesting that TB can affect this group even when they are not affected by the disease. No study provided sufficient follow-up to observe the long-term socioeconomic effect of TB in this age group.

conclusionThe evidence gathered in this review reinforces our understanding of the impact of TB on children and adolescents and highlights the importance of considering effects during the entire life course. Both ad-hoc and sustainable social protection measures and strategies are essential to mitigate the socioeconomic consequences of TB among children and adolescents.

Indexed as

TuberculosisAdolescentChildDatabases, FactualEducational StatusHumansKnowledgeSocial StigmaAdolescenceChildhoodLife-courseSocioeconomicTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36419146
PMCPMC9686126
OpenAlexW4309913005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.