Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
A predictive model for the critical shoulder angle based on a three-dimensional analysis of scapular angular and linear morphometrics.
Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Faster R-CNN model for target recognition and diagnosis of scapular fractures.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to define the features of scapular morphology that are associated with changes in the critical shoulder angle (CSA) by developing the best predictive model for the CSA based on multiple potential explanatory variables, using a completely 3D assessment.
methods3D meshes were created from CT DICOMs using InVesalius (Vers 3.1.1, RTI [Renato Archer Information Technology Centre], Brazil) and Meshmixer (3.4.35, Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA). The analysis included 17 potential angular, weighted linear and area measurements. The correlation of the explanatory variables with the CSA was investigated with the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Using multivariable linear regression, the approach for predictive model-building was leave-one-out cross-validation and best subset selection.
resultsFifty-three meshes were analysed. Glenoid inclination (GI) and coronal plane angulation of the acromion (CPAA) [Pearson's r: 0.535; -0.502] correlated best with CSA. The best model (adjusted R-squared value 0.67) for CSA prediction contained 10 explanatory variables including glenoid, scapular spine and acromial factors. CPAA and GI were the most important based on their distribution, estimate of coefficients and loss in predictive power if removed.
conclusionsThe relationship between scapular morphology and CSA is more complex than the concept of it being dictated solely by GI and acromial horizontal offset and includes glenoid, scapular spine and acromial factors of which CPAA and GI are most important. A further investigation in a closely defined cohort with rotator cuff tears is required before drawing any clinical conclusions about the role of surgical modification of scapular morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 retrospective observational cohort study with no comparison group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.