Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419089›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2022

Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of scaling-up the Friendship Bench in Zimbabwe - a quantitative observational study.

Ruth Verhey, Charmaine Chitiyo, Sandra Mboweni, Jean Turner, Gift Murombo, Andy Healey, Dixon Chibanda, Bradley H Wagenaar, Ricardo Araya

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruth VerheyFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe. ruth.verhey@zol.co.zw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5959-1891
Charmaine ChitiyoFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sandra MboweniFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jean TurnerFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Gift MuromboWomen's University in Africa (WUA), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Andy HealeyCentre for Global Mental Health, King's College, IOPPN, London, UK.
Dixon ChibandaFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Bradley H WagenaarDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ricardo ArayaCentre for Global Mental Health, King's College, IOPPN, London, UK.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWKing's College London · GBUniversity of Washington · USWomen's University in Africa · ZWZimbabwe Open University · ZW

Funding

GACD MRC MRC UKRI MR/S004270/1.Medical Research Council MR/S004270/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the real-world implementation of the Friendship Bench (FB) - an evidence-based brief psychological intervention delivered by community health workers (CHWs) - three years after its implementation in three city health departments in Zimbabwe. Implementation sites were evaluated according to their current performance using the RE-AIM framework making this one of the first evaluations of a scaled-up evidence-based psychological intervention in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

methodsUsing the RE-AIM guide ( www.re-aim.org ), the authors designed quantitative indicators based on existing FB implementation data. Thirty-six primary health care clinics (PHC) in Harare (n=28), Chitungwiza (n=4) and Gweru (n=4) were included. Among these clinics 20 were large comprehensive health care centers, 7 medium (mostly maternal and child healthcare) and 9 small clinics (basic medical care and acting as referral clinic). Existing data from these clinics, added to additionally collected data through interviews and field observations were used to investigate and compare the performance of the FB across clinics. The focus was on the RE-AIM domains of Reach, Adoption, and Implementation.

resultsSmall clinics achieved 34% reach, compared to large (15%) and medium clinics (9%). Adoption was high in all clinic types, ranging from 59% to 71%. Small clinics led the implementation domain with 53%, followed by medium sized clinics 43% and large clinics 40%. Small clinics performed better in all indicators and differences in performance between small and large clinics were significant. Program activity and data quality depends on ongoing support for delivering agents and buy-in from health authorities.

conclusionThe Friendship Bench program was implemented over three years transitioning from a research-based implementation program to one led locally. The Reach domain showed the largest gap across clinics where larger clinics performed poorly relative to smaller clinics and should be a target for future implementation improvements. Program data needs to be integrated into existing health information systems. Future studies should seek to optimize scale-up and sustainment strategies to maintain effective task-shared psychological interventions in SSA.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyFriendsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildData CollectionHumansZimbabwecommon mental disorders (CMD)Friendship Benchimplementation evaluationLow- and middle-income countriesMental healthRE-AIMscale upsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID36419089
PMCPMC9682765
OpenAlexW4309838262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.