Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419031›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Management of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: recommendations of a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Mastology.

Ruffo Freitas-Junior, Vilmar Marques de Oliveira, Antonio Luiz Frasson, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Fabio Postiglione Mansani, André Mattar, Felipe Pereira Zerwes, Adriana Magalhães de Oliveira Freitas, Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza, Andrea P Damin and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Ruffo Freitas-JuniorAdvanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, 1ª Avenida, s/n, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil. ruffojr@terra.com.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-8598
Vilmar Marques de OliveiraSchool of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-5616
Antonio Luiz FrassonPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-6898
Francisco Pimentel CavalcanteFortaleza General Hospital, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-2890
Fabio Postiglione MansaniDepartment of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-1591
André MattarReference Center in Women's Health Care, Pérola Byington Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-623X
Felipe Pereira ZerwesPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-727X
Adriana Magalhães de Oliveira FreitasLarmony Clinic, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-4154
Alessandra Borba Anton de SouzaPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-7076
Andrea P DaminFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-7388
Annamaria Massahud Rodrigues Dos SantosSanta Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-2447
Carlos Alberto RuizTeaching Hospital, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-5478
Clécio Ênio Murta de LucenaFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-1828
Eduardo Camargo MillenOncoclínicas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-6324
Fábio BagnoliSchool of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-3780
Felipe AndradeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-0053
Frank Lane Braga RodriguesInstitute of Mastology and Oncology and the Goiania Institute of Hematology (INGOH), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-1897
Gil FacinaDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-0295
Guilherme NovitaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-3199
Jose Luiz PedriniNossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-3238
José Pereira GuaráTeaching Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8225-0366
Leonardo Ribeiro SoaresAdvanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Dona Iris Women's and Maternity Hospital, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-6114
Marcus Vinicius de Nigro CorpaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-3120
Mauro PassosHospital de Base, Federal District, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0609-1751
Nancy Cristina Ferraz de Lucena FerreiraBarão de Lucena Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2299-1234
Nilceana Maya Aires FreitasRadiotherapy Unit, Araújo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, and Brazilian Center for Radiotherapy, Oncology and Mastology (CEBROM), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9445-8674
Rafael Henrique Szymanski MachadoHospital Federal da Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-7630
Roberto Kepler da Cunha AmaralGrupo CAM / Oncoclínicas, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-3822
Tomás ReinertOncoclínicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) and the Serra Gaúcha Research Center, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4715-1415
Vinicius Milani BudelTeaching Hospital of the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-5987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous subtype involving different patterns of behavior and clinical course, demanding a complex, individualized sequence of treatment. The knowledge and attitudes of the affiliated members of the Brazilian Society of Mastology regarding TNBC were evaluated and a consensus regarding management and treatment was reached.

methodsAffiliates completed a survey involving 44 objective questions. In addition, a specialist meeting was held with 27 experts and 3 ad hoc consultants. The panelists completed the survey before and after brainstorming. Answers achieving 70% of agreement were considered consensual. The chi-square test was used to compare answers between panelists and affiliates and the Kappa coefficient to calculate agreement.

resultsConsensus among the panelists increased from 26 (59.1%) to 32 questions (72.7%) following brainstorming (p = 0.17), including 7/10 questions on systemic treatment. Among the affiliates, consensus was achieved for 24 questions (54.5%), resulting in moderate agreement (κ = 0.445). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be indicated for almost all cases (except cT1a-b N0) and should include platinum agents. When indicated, immunotherapy is part of the standard of care. The panel reaffirmed the concept of no ink on tumor as indicative of adequate margins and the possibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cN1 patients who become cN0 following neoadjuvant therapy. Controversies remain on combining immunotherapy with capecitabine/olaparib in pertinent cases.

conclusionExpert consensus was achieved for > 70% of the questions, with moderate agreement between panelists and affiliates. Educational interventions on systemic breast cancer treatment affected decision-making in 60% of the questions.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBrazilCapecitabineHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyCapecitabineBreast cancerConsensus development conferencesTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID36419031
PMCPMC9682792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.