Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419024›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

In the need of a digital cicerone in healthcare? - Guidance for parents.

C Bäckström, R Knez, M Fahlgren, M Synnergren, V Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C BäckströmSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden. caroline.backstrom@hb.se.
R KnezSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden.
M FahlgrenSkaraborg Hospital, Lövängsvägen, SE-541 42, Skövde, Sweden.
M SynnergrenSkaraborg Hospital, Lövängsvägen, SE-541 42, Skövde, Sweden.
V LarssonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore parents' experiences using digital tools in relation to pregnancy, labor and birth, and the child's first 18 months.

backgroundParents find relevant information using digital healthcare tools, material obtained from professionals, as well as personal opinions and experiences that vary in quality.

methodFifteen parents were interviewed and data were analyzed beginning with content analysis and followed by thematic analysis.

resultsThe main theme was insecurity and responsibility for own choices and knowledge. Parents use digital tools to take responsibility for their insecurity and need for knowledge when entering parenthood.

conclusionThe parents' experiences highlighted that (1) insecurity can be both eased and enhanced using digital tools, (2) they took responsibility for feelings of insecurity and the search for knowledge, and (3) they needed knowledge to make the right choices and feel secure that these choices are made in the best interest of their new family.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesParentsChildDelivery of Health CareEmotionsFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyAntenatal careBirthChild healthcareDigitalizationLaborParenthoodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36419024
PMCPMC9685150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.