Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419010›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2022

Priorities for successful use of artificial intelligence by public health organizations: a literature review.

Stacey Fisher, Laura C Rosella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Addressing Health Disparities through Community Engagement in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Digital paradigm of public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Will AI Improve Public Health? Setting the Standards for Meaningful Impact.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  20. Integrating Artificial Intelligence Solutions from Precision Medicine and Genomics to Precision Public Health and Public Health Genomics Knowledge Base.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacey FisherDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. stacey.fisher@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-7806
Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve public health's ability to promote the health of all people in all communities. To successfully realize this potential and use AI for public health functions it is important for public health organizations to thoughtfully develop strategies for AI implementation. Six key priorities for successful use of AI technologies by public health organizations are discussed: 1) Contemporary data governance; 2) Investment in modernized data and analytic infrastructure and procedures; 3) Addressing the skills gap in the workforce; 4) Development of strategic collaborative partnerships; 5) Use of good AI practices for transparency and reproducibility, and; 6) Explicit consideration of equity and bias.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePublic HealthHumansInvestmentsOrganizationsReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceHealth policyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36419010
PMCPMC9682716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.