Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418975›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Multivariate analysis of independent determinants of ADL/IADL and quality of life in the elderly.

Sebastian Beltz, Simone Gloystein, Thomas Litschko, Sonja Laag, Neeltje van den Berg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07506278 (Evaluating The Effect Of Fraity Intervention In Older Adults With Typ 2 Diabetes Using Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07506278 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating The Effect Of Fraity Intervention In Older Adults With Typ 2 Diabetes Using Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Geriatric HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Fraity Syndrome, Exercise InterventionArmsVivifrail Exercise Programme Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subjective Financial Strain and Objective Financial Impacts Among Informal Caregivers in the United States.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian BeltzInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. sebastianbeltz@hotmail.de.
Simone GloysteinInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas LitschkoInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Sonja LaagDepartment for Product Strategy/Development, BARMER Health Insurance, Wuppertal, Germany.
Neeltje van den BergInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEBARMER GEK · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the determinants of disability and quality of life in elderly people who participated at the multi-centred RubiN project (Regional ununterbrochen betreut im Netz) in Germany.

methodsBaseline data of the subjects aged 70 years and older of the RubiN project were used and only subjects with complete data sets were considered for the ensuing analysis (complete case analysis (CCA)). Disability was examined using the concepts of ADL (activities of daily living) and IADL (instrumental activities of daily living). Subjects exhibiting one or more deficiencies in ADL respectively IADL were considered as ADL respectively IADL disabled. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF and the WHOQOL-OLD. Applying multivariate analysis, sociodemographic factors, psychosocial characteristics as well as the functional, nutritional and cognitive status were explored as potential determinants of disability and quality of life in the elderly.

resultsOne thousand three hundred seventy-five subjects from the RubiN project exhibited data completeness regarding baseline data. ADL and IADL disability were both associated with the respective other construct of disability, sex, a reduced cognitive and functional status as well as domains of the WHOQOL-BREF. Furthermore, ADL disability was related to social participation, while IADL disability was linked to age, education and social support. Sex, ADL and IADL disability, income, social support and social participation as well as the functional status were predictors of the domain 'Physical Health' (WHOQOL-BREF). The facet 'Social Participation' (WHOQOL-OLD) was affected by both ADL and IADL disability, income, social participation, the nutritional and also the functional status.

conclusionsSeveral potential determinants of disability and quality of life were identified and confirmed in this study. Attention should be drawn to prevention schemes as many of these determinants appear to be at least partly modifiable.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMultivariate AnalysisSocial ParticipationSocial SupportADLDisabilityElderlyIADLMultivariate analysisPhysical healthQuality of lifeSocial participationWHOQOL-BREFWHOQOL-OLD

Identifiers

PMID36418975
PMCPMC9682836
OpenAlexW4309747606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.