Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418959›Full record

Observational studyBMC gastroenterology2022

Effect of posture on anorectal manometric measurements in female patients with fecal incontinence and rectoanal intussusception.

Akira Tsunoda, Tomoko Takahashi, Ikuko Osawa

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akira TsunodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan. tsunoda.akira@kameda.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-0219
Tomoko TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan.
Ikuko OsawaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan.
Kameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the influence of erect position on anorectal manometry in patients with rectoanal intussusception (RAI).

methodsThis was a single center prospective observational study. Eighty female patients with fecal incontinence (FI) who underwent defecography between 1st January 2016 and 30th April 2022 were included. The effect of posture on commonly measured parameters during manometry was assessed in the left-lateral and erect positions. The severity of FI was assessed using FI Severity Index (FISI).

resultsDefecography showed that 30 patients had circumferential RAI (CRAI), and 50 had non-CRAI. There were no significant differences in age, parity, FI type, and FISI scores between the groups. However, FISI scores were significantly lower in 51 patients with passive FI than 12 patients with mixed FI type [21 (8-38) vs. 32 (8-43), P = 0.007]. Endo-anal ultrasound showed no significant difference in the incidence of sphincter defects between the groups. Maximum squeeze pressure was significantly lower in the erect position than in the left-lateral position in the CRAI patients [119 cm H

conclusionVoluntary contraction in female FI patients with CRAI was suppressed in the erect position.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceIntussusceptionAnal CanalFemaleHumansManometryPosturePregnancyFecal incontinenceRectoanal intussusceptionSqueeze pressure

Identifiers

PMID36418959
PMCPMC9682782
OpenAlexW4309746234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.