Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418896›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Polymeric micelles effectively reprogram the tumor microenvironment to potentiate nano-immunotherapy in mouse breast cancer models.

Myrofora Panagi, Fotios Mpekris, Pengwen Chen, Chrysovalantis Voutouri, Yasuhiro Nakagawa, John D Martin, Tetsuro Hiroi, Hiroko Hashimoto, Philippos Demetriou, Chryso Pierides and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis of multi-drug cancer nanomedicine.Nature nanotechnology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Dual metabolic checkpoint blockadeBioactive materials · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Myrofora Panagi *Cancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-6256-3250
Fotios Mpekris *Cancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Pengwen Chen *Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chrysovalantis VoutouriCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Yasuhiro NakagawaDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
John D MartinDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-8203
Tetsuro HiroiDivision of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroko HashimotoDivision of Innovative Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Philippos DemetriouThe Center for the Study of Hematological and other Malignancies, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Chryso PieridesThe Center for the Study of Hematological and other Malignancies, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Rekha SamuelCenter for Stem Cell Research (a unit of inStem Bengaluru), Christian Medical College Campus Bagayam, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Andreas StylianouCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Christina MichaelCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Shigeto FukushimaDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Paraskevi GeorgiouBasic and Translational Cancer Research Center, School of Sciences, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Panagiotis PapageorgisBasic and Translational Cancer Research Center, School of Sciences, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Petri Ch PapaphilippouCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Laura KoumasThe Center for the Study of Hematological and other Malignancies, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Paul CosteasThe Center for the Study of Hematological and other Malignancies, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Genichiro IshiiDivision of Innovative Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Motohiro KojimaDivision of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Kazunori KataokaInnovation Center of NanoMedicine, Kawasaki Institute of Industrial Promotion, Kawasaki, Japan.
Horacio CabralDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan. horacio@bmw.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4030-2631
Triantafyllos StylianopoulosCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. tstylian@ucy.ac.cy.ORCID 0000-0002-3093-1696
University of Cyprus · CYThe University of Tokyo · JPCenter for the Study of Childhood and Adolescence · CYNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPEuropean University Cyprus · CYChristian Medical College, Vellore · INTokyo Future University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano-immunotherapy improves breast cancer outcomes but not all patients respond and none are cured. To improve efficacy, research focuses on drugs that reprogram cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) to improve therapeutic delivery and immunostimulation. These drugs, however, have a narrow therapeutic window and cause adverse effects. Developing strategies that increase CAF-reprogramming while limiting adverse effects is urgent. Here, taking advantage of the CAF-reprogramming capabilities of tranilast, we developed tranilast-loaded micelles. Strikingly, a 100-fold reduced dose of tranilast-micelles induces superior reprogramming compared to free drug owing to enhanced intratumoral accumulation and cancer-associated fibroblast uptake. Combination of tranilast-micelles and epirubicin-micelles or Doxil with immunotherapy increases T-cell infiltration, resulting in cures and immunological memory in mice bearing immunotherapy-resistant breast cancer. Furthermore, shear wave elastography (SWE) is able to monitor reduced tumor stiffness caused by tranilast-micelles and predict response to nano-immunotherapy. Micellar encapsulation is a promising strategy for TME-reprogramming and SWE is a potential biomarker of response.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNeoplasmsAnimalsImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyMiceMicellesortho-AminobenzoatesPolymersTumor MicroenvironmentImmunologic FactorsMicellesortho-AminobenzoatesPolymerstranilast

Identifiers

PMID36418896
PMCPMC9684407
OpenAlexW4309746155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.