ArticleScientific reports2022
The clinical experience of the prognosis in opposite CEA and image change after therapy in stage IV colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-CEA Ratio in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Beyond individual markers: Prognostic value of the combined CEA/PNI score in metastatic colorectal cancer as a predictor of survival.PloS one · 2026Article
- A clinical study of the CALLY index and HALP score for evaluating response to FOLFOX in colorectal cancer with lung metastases.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Multidimensional impact of venous thromboembolism on survival outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: deconstructing competing risks between thrombosis-related and tumor-related mortality.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- The heterogeneous expression patterns of serum tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients are predictive factors for progression-free survival.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Tumor Microenvironment and Modulation of Immunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancer.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Circulating serum exosomes 5'Leader ArgTCG and 3'tRF SerGCT combined with tumor biomarkers as non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring indicators for colorectal cancer.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- The effects of two combined methods of P53 expression and preoperative serum CEA detection on the prognosis of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A large-scale study integrating CEA and tumor deposits to evaluate prognosis in colon cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Synthetic circuits based on split Cas9 to detect cellular events.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and imaging are used to guide treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study evaluated changes in CEA and imaging findings in mCRC patients following systemic therapy and their clinical significance, especially the ones with inconsistent results of CEA and image findings. We enrolled 330 stage IV CRC patients who systemic therapy. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and a modification for CEA, patients were stratified into consistent and inconsistent response groups. Clinicopathological features and prognoses were compared between each groups. Different CEA/IMG groups showed no significant differences in terms of tumor location, initial CEA level, mucinous component, tumor differentiation and further surgical treatment rate. Inconsistent responses were observed in half of the patients (n = 165, 50%). The prognosis in the inconsistent groups with either CEA-SD or IMG-SD was dependent on the result of the other evaluation method (PR or PD). Cases with conflicting results between CEA and image groups (CEA-RD/IMG-PD, CEA-PD/IMG-PR) had an OS close to that of CEA-SD/IMG-SD (18.2 m, 16.2 m vs. 18.8 m, P = 0.620). The overall survival (OS) in the consistent (PR/PR ro PD/PD) groups were significantly different (P < 0.001). Combining CEA and imaging provides more information about mCRC patients who have undergone systemic therapy. Approximately half the patients have inconsistent responses, which is still valuable in predicting the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.