Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418622›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Machine learning on MRI radiomic features: identification of molecular subtype alteration in breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

Hai-Qing Liu, Si-Ying Lin, Yi-Dong Song, Si-Yao Mai, Yue-Dong Yang, Kai Chen, Zhuo Wu, Hui-Ying Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hai-Qing LiuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Si-Ying LinSchool of Software Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
Yi-Dong SongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Si-Yao MaiDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yue-Dong YangSchool of Software Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
Kai ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhuo WuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. wuzhuo@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-9571
Hui-Ying ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. zhaohy8@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1309100the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent studies have revealed the change of molecular subtypes in breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). This study aims to construct a non-invasive model for predicting molecular subtype alteration in breast cancer after NAT.

methodsEighty-two estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative or ER-low-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients who underwent NAT and completed baseline MRI were retrospectively recruited between July 2010 and November 2020. Subtype alteration was observed in 21 cases after NAT. A 2D-DenseUNet machine-learning model was built to perform automatic segmentation of breast cancer. 851 radiomic features were extracted from each MRI sequence (T2-weighted imaging, ADC, DCE, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging), both in the manual and auto-segmentation masks. All samples were divided into a training set (n = 66) and a test set (n = 16). XGBoost model with 5-fold cross-validation was performed to predict molecular subtype alterations in breast cancer patients after NAT. The predictive ability of these models was subsequently evaluated by the AUC of the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsA model consisting of three radiomics features from the manual segmentation of multi-sequence MRI achieved favorable predictive efficacy in identifying molecular subtype alteration in BC after NAT (cross-validation set: AUC = 0.908, independent test set: AUC = 0.864); whereas an automatic segmentation approach of BC lesions on the DCE sequence produced good segmentation results (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.720).

conclusionsA machine learning model based on baseline MRI is proven useful for predicting molecular subtype alterations in breast cancer after NAT. KEY POINTS: • Machine learning models using MRI-based radiomics signature have the ability to predict molecular subtype alterations in breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, which subsequently affect treatment protocols. • The application of deep learning in the automatic segmentation of breast cancer lesions from MRI images shows the potential to replace manual segmentation..

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesBreast neoplasmsMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID36418622
OpenAlexW4309878709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.