Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418574›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Portfolio-based learning in surgery : Making competencies "visible"].

S Herbstreit, L Hille, F Rademacher, M Burggraf, B Mester, M Dudda

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S HerbstreitZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. stephanie.herbstreit@uk-essen.de.
L HilleZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
F RademacherZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
M BurggrafZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
B MesterZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
M DuddaZentrum für Muskuloskelettale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Essen, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to an increasing competence orientation of medical studies, surgical curricula are being adapted in many places. In addition to surgical knowledge and practical skills, these should also teach competencies in differential diagnostics and treatment. The teaching of surgical knowledge through lectures and seminars and the demonstration of practical skills, e.g., through the use of logbooks in the Bock Practical Surgery (BP), only allows limited active engagement with surgical competencies on differential diagnostics and treatment. A reflection-based portfolio allows, through the independent written elaboration of surgical topics, an active engagement with the competencies and promises a higher learning effect. In the context of the implementation of such a portfolio as part of the proof of activity in BP, the effects on the acquisition of competencies and on the way of learning were investigated. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing a mixed methods approach, we compared competence acquisition using a reflection-based portfolio with learning using a logbook. Students conducted a self-assessment of competencies using questionnaire surveys before and after the BP. Through focus group interviews with discussions among students using a guideline, we explored the different ways of acquiring competencies. In addition, the examination and evaluation results of both cohorts were compared. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Students' self-assessed competency acquisition and examination and evaluation results showed no differences when comparing the two cohorts. During the focus group interviews, we were able to show that in the perception of the students, surgical competencies can be made more visible and thus more explicit with the help of a reflection-based portfolio. In addition, self-regulated learning was promoted without neglecting practical skills. Students demanded greater supervision and guidance by mentors in both groups.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFocus GroupsHumansStudentsBlock practical trainingCompetence orientationPortfolioReflectionUndergraduate surgical education

Identifiers

PMID36418574
PMCPMC9950161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.