Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418564›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2023

"The wrong tools for the right job": a critical meta-analysis of traditional tests to assess behavioural impacts of maternal separation.

Olivia Stupart, Trevor W Robbins, Jeffrey W Dalley

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivia StupartDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Jeffrey W DalleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. jwd20@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-3660
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000183Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleUnconditioned tasks in rodents have been the mainstay of behavioural assessment for decades, but their validity and sensitivity to detect the behavioural consequences of early life stress (ELS) remains contentious and highly variable.

objectivesIn the present study, we carried out a meta-analysis to investigate whether persistent behavioural effects, as assessed using unconditioned procedures in rats, are a reliable consequence of early repeated maternal separation, a commonly used procedure in rodents to study ELS.

methodsA literature search identified 100 studies involving maternally separated rats and the following unconditioned procedures: the elevated plus maze (EPM); open field test (OFT); sucrose preference test (SPT) and forced swim task (FST). Studies were included for analysis if the separation of offspring from the dam was at least 60 min every day during the pre-weaning period prior to the start of adolescence.

resultsOur findings show that unconditioned tasks are generally poor at consistently demonstrating differences between control and separated groups with pooled effect sizes that were either small or non-existent (EPM: Hedge's g =  - 0.35, p = 0.01, OFT: Hedge's g =  - 0.32, p = 0.05, SPT: Hedge's g =  - 0.33, p = 0.21, FST: Hedge's g = 0.99, p = 0.0001). Despite considerable procedural variability between studies, heterogeneity statistics were low; indicating the lack of standardization in the maternal separation protocol was the not the cause of these inconsistent effects.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that in general, unconditioned tests of depression and anxiety are not sufficient to reveal the full behavioural repertoire of maternal separation stress should not be relied upon in isolation. We argue that more objective tasks that sensitively detect specific cognitive processes are better suited for translational research on stress-related disorders such as depression.

Indexed as

AnxietyMaternal DeprivationAnimalsAnxiety DisordersDepressionMotor ActivityRatsStress, PsychologicalSwimmingEarly life adversityElevated plus mazeEndophenotypesForced swim testStress-related disordersSucrose preference test

Identifiers

PMID36418564
PMCPMC10593619
OpenAlexW4309878720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.