Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418465›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Genome sequence and silkomics of the spindle ermine moth, Yponomeuta cagnagella, representing the early diverging lineage of the ditrysian Lepidoptera.

Anna Volenikova, Petr Nguyen, Peter Davey, Hana Sehadova, Barbara Kludkiewicz, Petr Koutecky, James R Walters, Peter Roessingh, Irena Provaznikova, Michal Sery and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Life inside a bag: multiomics insights into the bagworm species Eumeta crameri.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Anna Volenikova *Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9504-8044
Petr Nguyen *Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-4287
Peter DaveySchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hana SehadovaBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-0871
Barbara KludkiewiczBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Petr KouteckyFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
James R WaltersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-995X
Peter RoessinghInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irena ProvaznikovaBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Michal SeryBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Martina ZurovcovaBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Miluse HradilovaInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic.
Lenka RouhovaBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Michal ZurovecBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. zurovec@entu.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-0913-166X
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZSewanee: The University of the South · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many lepidopteran species produce silk, cocoons, feeding tubes, or nests for protection from predators and parasites for caterpillars and pupae. Yet, the number of lepidopteran species whose silk composition has been studied in detail is very small, because the genes encoding the major structural silk proteins tend to be large and repetitive, making their assembly and sequence analysis difficult. Here we have analyzed the silk of Yponomeuta cagnagella, which represents one of the early diverging lineages of the ditrysian Lepidoptera thus improving the coverage of the order. To obtain a comprehensive list of the Y. cagnagella silk genes, we sequenced and assembled a draft genome using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina technologies. We used a silk-gland transcriptome and a silk proteome to identify major silk components and verified the tissue specificity of expression of individual genes. A detailed annotation of the major genes and their putative products, including their complete sequences and exon-intron structures is provided. The morphology of silk glands and fibers are also shown. This study fills an important gap in our growing understanding of the structure, evolution, and function of silk genes and provides genomic resources for future studies of the chemical ecology of Yponomeuta species.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsGenomicsProteomePupaSilkProteomeSilk

Identifiers

PMID36418465
PMCPMC9684489
OpenAlexW4309745264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.