ArticleScientific reports2022
Individualized anemia management enhanced by ferric pyrophosphate citrate protocol.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model-Informed Drug Development for Daprodustat Supports the Design of Individualized Dosing Regimens in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Anemia.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Usage of the Anemia Control Model Is Associated with Reduced Hospitalization Risk in Hemodialysis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and parenteral iron in managing anemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains controversial. One-size-fits-all rule-based algorithms dominate dosing protocols for ESA and parenteral iron. However, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for using ESAs in chronic kidney disease recommend individualized therapy for the patient. This prospective quality assurance project was at a single hemodialysis (HD) center comprising three 6-month phases (A, B, C) separated by 3-month washout periods. Standard bi-weekly ESA dose titration and intravenous (IV) iron sucrose protocols were used in baseline Phase A, and ferric pyrophosphate citrate (FPC) augmented iron in Phase B. In Phase C, an FPC protocol and weekly, individualized ESA management were used. We examined clinic-level mean differences in hemoglobin (Hb) and ESRD-related outcomes by phase with repeated ANOVA. To examine the Hb at the patient level, we used multi-level mixed-effect regression adjusting for phase, month, and other relevant confounders at each month over time to derive the mean marginal effects of phase. There were 54, 78, and 66 patients in phases A, B, and C, respectively, with raw mean Hb values of 9.9, 10.2, and 10.3 g/dL. The percentage of Hb values < 9 g/dL declined from 14.3% in Phase A to 7.6% in Phase C (p = 0.007). The multivariable mixed-effect regression results showed mean marginal Hb was higher by 0.3 mg/dL and 0.4 mg/dL in Phases B and C, respectively, compared to Phase A. We also observed reduced ferritin (p = 0.003) and transferrin saturation (TSAT) (p = 0.008) levels from Phase A to Phase C with the repeated ANOVA analysis. Ferric pyrophosphate citrate (FPC) appears to support more efficient ESA-stimulated erythropoiesis. Moreover, individualized ESA management combined with FPC (Phase C) was associated with further improvement in efficiency as we observed the fewest patients with Hb values < 9 g/dL concurrent with greater decreases in ferritin levels and reduced ESA doses. However, future prospective studies to confirm these findings on a larger, more diverse cohort of ESRD patients are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.