Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) and machine learning, a step toward automatized tsetse (Glossina spp.) identification.

Arnaud Cannet, Camille Simon-Chane, Mohammad Akhoundi, Aymeric Histace, Olivier Romain, Marc Souchaud, Pierre Jacob, Pascal Delaunay, Darian Sereno, Philippe Bousses and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Arnaud Cannet *Direction des affaires sanitaires et sociales de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Nouméa, New Caledonia, France.
Camille Simon-Chane *ETIS UMR 8051, Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000, Cergy, France.
Mohammad Akhoundi *Parasitology-Mycology, Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
Aymeric Histace *ETIS UMR 8051, Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000, Cergy, France.
Olivier Romain *ETIS UMR 8051, Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000, Cergy, France.
Marc Souchaud *ETIS UMR 8051, Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000, Cergy, France.
Pierre JacobETIS UMR 8051, Cergy Paris University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000, Cergy, France.
Pascal DelaunayInserm U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire (C3M), Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Darian SerenoInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, IRD-CIRAD, Parasitology Infectiology and Public Health Research Group, Montpellier, France.
Philippe BoussesMIVEGEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Pascal GrebautInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, IRD-CIRAD, Parasitology Infectiology and Public Health Research Group, Montpellier, France.
Anne GeigerInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, IRD-CIRAD, Parasitology Infectiology and Public Health Research Group, Montpellier, France.
Chantel de BeerInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Center of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria.
Dramane KabaInstitut Pierre Richet, Institut National de Santé Publique, Abidjian, Côte d'Ivoire.
Denis Sereno *InterTryp, Univ Montpellier, IRD-CIRAD, Parasitology Infectiology and Public Health Research Group, Montpellier, France. denis.sereno@ird.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGouvernement de la Nouvelle-Calédonie · NCInstitut National de Santé Publique · CIInternational Atomic Energy Agency · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple method for accurately identifying Glossina spp in the field is a challenge to sustain the future elimination of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) as a public health scourge, as well as for the sustainable management of African Animal Trypanosomiasis (AAT). Current methods for Glossina species identification heavily rely on a few well-trained experts. Methodologies that rely on molecular methodologies like DNA barcoding or mass spectrometry protein profiling (MALDI TOFF) haven't been thoroughly investigated for Glossina sp. Nevertheless, because they are destructive, costly, time-consuming, and expensive in infrastructure and materials, they might not be well adapted for the survey of arthropod vectors involved in the transmission of pathogens responsible for Neglected Tropical Diseases, like HAT. This study demonstrates a new type of methodology to classify Glossina species. In conjunction with a deep learning architecture, a database of Wing Interference Patterns (WIPs) representative of the Glossina species involved in the transmission of HAT and AAT was used. This database has 1766 pictures representing 23 Glossina species. This cost-effective methodology, which requires mounting wings on slides and using a commercially available microscope, demonstrates that WIPs are an excellent medium to automatically recognize Glossina species with very high accuracy.

Indexed as

Trypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesAnimalsDatabases, FactualHumansMachine LearningNeglected DiseasesSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID36418429
PMCPMC9684539
OpenAlexW4309748720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.