ArticleScientific reports2022
Hierarchical organization of objects in scenes is reflected in mental representations of objects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial proximity and scene grammar: shaping spatial representations for memory-guided actions in naturalistic environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The development of object representations in children.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Anchor objects guide spatial attention during visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Preparatory attentional templates in prefrontal and sensory cortex encode target-associated information.eLife · 2025Article
- Processing of Scene-Grammar Inconsistencies in Children with Developmental Language Disorder-Insights from Implicit and Explicit Measures.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Anchor objects drive realism while diagnostic objects drive categorization in GAN generated scenes.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- How does the "default mode" network contribute to semantic cognition?Brain and language · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The arrangement of objects in scenes follows certain rules ("Scene Grammar"), which we exploit to perceive and interact efficiently with our environment. We have proposed that Scene Grammar is hierarchically organized: scenes are divided into clusters of objects ("phrases", e.g., the sink phrase); within every phrase, one object ("anchor", e.g., the sink) holds strong predictions about identity and position of other objects ("local objects", e.g., a toothbrush). To investigate if this hierarchy is reflected in the mental representations of objects, we collected pairwise similarity judgments for everyday object pictures and for the corresponding words. Similarity judgments were stronger not only for object pairs appearing in the same scene, but also object pairs appearing within the same phrase of the same scene as opposed to appearing in different phrases of the same scene. Besides, object pairs with the same status in the scenes (i.e., being both anchors or both local objects) were judged as more similar than pairs of different status. Comparing effects between pictures and words, we found similar, significant impact of scene hierarchy on the organization of mental representation of objects, independent of stimulus modality. We conclude that the hierarchical structure of visual environment is incorporated into abstract, domain general mental representations of the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.