Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418341›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Quality measures for fully automatic CT histogram-based fat estimation on a corpse sample.

Sebastian Schenkl, Michael Hubig, Holger Muggenthaler, Jayant Subramaniam Shanmugam, Felix Güttler, Andreas Heinrich, Ulf Teichgräber, Gita Mall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastian Schenkl *Institute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Michael Hubig *Institute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany. michael.hubig@med.uni-jena.de.
Holger MuggenthalerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Jayant Subramaniam ShanmugamInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Felix GüttlerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Andreas HeinrichInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Ulf TeichgräberInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.
Gita MallInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07749, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous article a new algorithm for fully automatic 'CT histogram based Fat Estimation and quasi-Segmentation' (CFES) was validated on synthetic data, on a special CT phantom, and tested on one corpse. Usage of said data in FE-modelling for temperature-based death time estimation is the investigation's number one long-term goal. The article presents CFES's results on a human corpse sample of size R = 32, evaluating three different performance measures: the τ-value, measuring the ability to differentiate fat from muscle, the anatomical fat-muscle misclassification rate D, and the weighted distance S between the empirical and the theoretical grey-scale value histogram. CFES-performance on the sample was: D = 3.6% for weight exponent α = 1, slightly higher for α ≥ 2 and much higher for α ≤ 0. Investigating τ, S and D on the sample revealed some unexpected results: While large values of τ imply small D-values, rising S implies falling D and there is a positive linear relationship between τ and S. The latter two findings seem to be counter-intuitive. Our Monte Carlo analysis detected a general umbrella type relation between τ and S, which seems to stem from a pivotal problem in fitting Normal mixture distributions.

Indexed as

AdiposityAlgorithmsCadaverHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36418341
PMCPMC9684132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.