Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418312›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Forest fire threatens global carbon sinks and population centres under rising atmospheric water demand.

Hamish Clarke, Rachael H Nolan, Victor Resco De Dios, Ross Bradstock, Anne Griebel, Shiva Khanal, Matthias M Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. When is fire weather extreme enough for active fire spread in Canada?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hamish ClarkeCentre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfire, Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. hamish.clarke@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-3729
Rachael H NolanNSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-5142
Victor Resco De DiosDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, Universitat de Lleida, Lérida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-1656
Ross BradstockCentre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfire, Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Anne GriebelNSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, Wollongong, Australia.
Shiva KhanalHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia.
Matthias M BoerHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-4572
Natural Hazards Research Australia · AUWestern Sydney University · AUNSW Department of Planning and Environment · AUSouthwest University of Science and Technology · CNThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levels of fire activity and severity that are unprecedented in the instrumental record have recently been observed in forested regions around the world. Using a large sample of daily fire events and hourly climate data, here we show that fire activity in all global forest biomes responds strongly and predictably to exceedance of thresholds in atmospheric water demand, as measured by maximum daily vapour pressure deficit. The climatology of vapour pressure deficit can therefore be reliably used to predict forest fire risk under projected future climates. We find that climate change is projected to lead to widespread increases in risk, with at least 30 additional days above critical thresholds for fire activity in forest biomes on every continent by 2100 under rising emissions scenarios. Escalating forest fire risk threatens catastrophic carbon losses in the Amazon and major population health impacts from wildfire smoke in south Asia and east Africa.

Indexed as

FiresWildfiresCarbon SequestrationForestsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID36418312
PMCPMC9684135
OpenAlexW4309840120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.