ArticlemAbs
A computational method for predicting the aggregation propensity of IgG1 and IgG4(P) mAbs in common storage buffers.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Conformational Instability of Monoclonal Antibodies During Chromatographic Purification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A First Insight into the Developability of an Immunoglobulin G3: A Combined Computational and Experimental Approach.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Prospects for the computational humanization of antibodies and nanobodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Accelerating therapeutic protein design with computational approaches toward the clinical stage.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The propensity for some monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to aggregate at physiological and manufacturing pH values can prevent their use as therapeutic molecules or delay time to market. Consequently, developability assessments are essential to select optimum candidates, or inform on mitigation strategies to avoid potential late-stage failures. These studies are typically performed in a range of buffer solutions because factors such as pH can dramatically alter the aggregation propensity of the test mAbs (up to 100-fold in extreme cases). A computational method capable of robustly predicting the aggregation propensity at the pH values of common storage buffers would have substantial value. Here, we describe a mAb aggregation prediction tool (MAPT) that builds on our previously published isotype-dependent, charge-based model of aggregation. We show that the addition of a homology model-derived hydrophobicity descriptor to our electrostatic aggregation model enabled the generation of a robust mAb developability indicator. To contextualize our aggregation scoring system, we analyzed 97 clinical-stage therapeutic mAbs. To further validate our approach, we focused on six mAbs (infliximab, tocilizumab, rituximab, CNTO607, MEDI1912 and MEDI1912_STT) which have been reported to cover a large range of aggregation propensities. The different aggregation propensities of the case study molecules at neutral and slightly acidic pH were correctly predicted, verifying the utility of our computational method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.