Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418156›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2023

Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis.

Xavier Montalban, Daniel Wallace, Mark C Genovese, Davorka Tomic, Dana Parsons-Rich, Claire Le Bolay, Amy H Kao, Hans Guehring

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02975336 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in Subjects With SLE

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2017 to 2020Enrolled469ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsPlacebo, M2951
NCT02975349 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of M2951 With a Parallel, Open-Label, Active Control Group (Tecfidera), in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Biological Activity.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2017 to 2024Enrolled267ConditionsRelapsing-remitting Multiple SclerosisArmsEvobrutinib, Placebo, Tecfidera
NCT03233230 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind Study in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Evobrutinib Compared With Placebo in Subjects With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled390ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsM2591 25 mg QD, M2951 75 mg QD, M2951 50 mg BID, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emerging Therapies for Anaphylaxis.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  6. Current and future landscape of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition for the treatment of allergic disorders.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Approaches Towards Better Immunosuppressive Agents.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Xavier MontalbanDepartment of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain xavier.montalban@cem-cat.org.
Daniel WallaceCedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mark C GenoveseDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Davorka TomicGlobal Clinical Development, Ares Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA.
Dana Parsons-RichGlobal Clinical Development, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA (affiliation at the time the research was conducted).
Claire Le BolayBiostatistics, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Amy H KaoTranslational Innovation Platform in Immunology & Neuroscience, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA.
Hans GuehringGlobal Patient Safety, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCenter for Global Development · USCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de CatalunyaMerck (Germany) · DEMerck Serono (Switzerland) · CHNational Patient Safety Foundation · USResearch & Development Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnalyse the integrated safety profile of evobrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), using pooled data from multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trials.

methodsPhase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial data were analysed (N=1083; MS: n=213, 48 weeks (W); RA: n=390, 12W; SLE: n=480, 52W). The analysis included all patients who received ≥1 dose of evobrutinib (25 mg or 75 mg once daily, or 50 mg or 75 mgtwice daily) or placebo. Descriptive statistics and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) were used to report treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

resultsData from 1083 patients were pooled: evobrutinib, n=861; placebo, n=271 (sum >1083 due to MS trial design: n=49 received both placebo (W0-24) and evobrutinib 25 mg (W25-48)); median follow-up time (pt-years): evobrutinib, 0.501; placebo, 0.463. Across indications, the proportion of patients with TEAEs and the EAIR were similar for evobrutinib and placebo (66.2% (247.6 events/100 pt-years) vs 62.4% (261.4 events/100 pt-years)). By indication, the EAIR (events/100 pt-years) of TEAEs for evobrutinib versus placebo were: MS: 119.7 vs 148.3; RA: 331.8 vs 306.8; SLE: 343.0 vs 302.1. Two fatal events occurred (in SLE). The serious infections EAIR was 2.7 and 2.1 events/100 pt-years for evobrutinib and placebo. For previously reported BTKi-class effects, the EAIR of transient elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase TEAEs (events/100 pt-years) with evobrutinib versus placebo was 4.8 vs 2.8/3.5 vs 0.7, respectively. IgG levels were similar in evobrutinib/placebo-treated patients.

conclusionsThis is the first BTKi-integrated safety analysis that includes patients with MS. Overall, evobrutinib treatment (all doses) was generally well tolerated across indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02975349, NCT03233230, NCT02975336.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMultiple SclerosisDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansPiperidinesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeevobrutinibPiperidinesPyrimidinesIMMUNOLOGYMULTIPLE SCLEROSISRHEUMATOLOGYSLE

Identifiers

PMID36418156
PMCPMC9763187
OpenAlexW4309822156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.