Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418144›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2023

Quality assessment of colour fundus and fluorescein angiography images using deep learning.

Michael König, Philipp Seeböck, Bianca S Gerendas, Georgios Mylonas, Rudolf Winklhofer, Ioanna Dimakopoulou, Ursula Margarethe Schmidt-Erfurth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael KönigDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Philipp SeeböckDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Bianca S GerendasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-8130
Georgios MylonasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Rudolf WinklhoferDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Ioanna DimakopoulouDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-3093
Ursula Margarethe Schmidt-ErfurthDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria ursula.schmidt-erfurth@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-7311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsImage quality assessment (IQA) is crucial for both reading centres in clinical studies and routine practice, as only adequate quality allows clinicians to correctly identify diseases and treat patients accordingly. Here we aim to develop a neural network for automated real-time IQA in colour fundus (CF) and fluorescein angiography (FA) images.

methodsTraining and evaluation of two neural networks were conducted using 2272 CF and 2492 FA images, with binary labels in four (contrast, focus, illumination, shadow and reflection) and three (contrast, focus, noise) modality specific categories plus an overall quality ranking. Performance was compared with a second human grader, evaluated on an external public dataset and in a clinical trial use-case.

resultsThe networks achieved a F1-score/area under the receiving operator characteristic/precision recall curve of 0.907/0.963/0.966 for CF and 0.822/0.918/0.889 for FA in overall quality prediction with similar results in most categories. A clear relation between model uncertainty and prediction error was observed. In the clinical trial use-case evaluation, the networks achieved an accuracy of 0.930 for CF and 0.895 for FA.

conclusionThe presented method allows automated IQA in real time, demonstrating human-level performance for CF as well as FA. Such models can help to overcome the problem of human intergrader and intragrader variability by providing objective and reproducible IQA results. It has particular relevance for real-time feedback in multicentre clinical studies, when images are uploaded to central reading centre portals. Moreover, automated IQA as preprocessing step can support integrating automated approaches into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningColorFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansNeural Networks, ComputerImaging

Identifiers

PMID36418144
PMCPMC10804038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.