Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418137›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial.

Sebastian Wolf, Luis Arbona de Gracia, Florian Sommer, Matthias Christian Schrempf, Matthias Anthuber, Dmytro Vlasenko

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian WolfDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany Sebastian.Wolf@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5298-8901
Luis Arbona de GraciaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Florian SommerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias Christian SchrempfDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2220-6427
Matthias AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Dmytro VlasenkoDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
University of Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe optimal closure of the abdominal wall after emergency midline laparotomy is still a matter of debate due to lack of evidence. Although closure of the fascia using a continuous, all-layer suture technique with slowly absorbable monofilament material is common, complications like burst abdomen and hernia are frequent. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation evaluates the efficacy and safety of a continuous suture with or without additional interrupted retention sutures for closure of the abdominal fascia. Patients with an indication for a primary emergency midline laparotomy are eligible to participate in this study and will be randomised intraoperatively via block randomisation. Fascia closure in the intervention group will be done with a standard continuous suture with slowly absorbable monofilament material (MonoMax 1, B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany) and additional interrupted retention sutures every 2 cm of the fascia using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl 2, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). In the control group, the fascia is closed only with the standard continuous suture with slowly absorbable monofilament material. Sample size calculations (n=111 per study arm) are based on the available literature. The primary endpoint is the rate of dehiscence of the abdominal fascia (rate of burst abdomen within 30 days or rate of incisional hernia within 12 months). Secondary endpoints are wound infections, quality of life, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Patients as well as individuals involved in data collection, endpoint assessment, data analysis and quality of life assessment will be blinded. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol, the patient information and the informed consent form have been approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (reference number: 20-1041). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024802. WHO UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBER: U1111-1259-1956.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallLaparotomyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuturesSuture TechniquesACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAdult surgerySURGERYWOUND MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID36418137
PMCPMC9685222
OpenAlexW4309797059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.