Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418125›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Protocol for a scoping review of patient-clinician digital health interventions for the population with hip fracture.

Chantal Backman, Steve Papp, Anne Harley, Sandra Houle, Becky Skidmore, Stephane Poitras, Maeghn Green, Soha Shah, Randa Berdusco, Paul Beaulé and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chantal BackmanFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada chantal.backman@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-8159
Steve PappDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anne HarleyDepartment of Care of the Elderly, Bruyere Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra HouleFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Becky SkidmoreIndependent Information Specialist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Stephane PoitrasFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Maeghn GreenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Soha ShahDepartment of Care of the Elderly, Bruyere Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Randa BerduscoDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Paul BeauléOrthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Véronique French-MerkleyDepartment of Care of the Elderly, Bruyere Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-clinician digital health interventions can potentially improve the care of patients with hip fracture transitioning from hospital to rehabilitation to home. Assisting older patients with a hip fracture and their caregivers in managing their postsurgery care is crucial for ensuring the best rehabilitation outcomes. With the increased availability and wide uptake of mobile devices, the use of digital health to better assist patients in their care has become more common. Among the older adult population, hip fractures are a common occurrence and integrated postsurgery care is key for optimal recovery. The overall aims are to examine the available literature on the impact of hip fracture-specific patient-clinician digital health interventions on patient outcomes and healthcare delivery processes; to identify the barriers and enablers to the uptake and implementation of these digital health interventions; and to provide strategies for improved use of digital health technologies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodology framework and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement for the Scoping Reviews reporting format. A search strategy will be developed, and key databases will be searched until approximately May 2022. A two-step screening process and data extraction of included studies will be performed by two reviewers. Any disagreement will be resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer. For the included studies, a narrative data synthesis will be conducted. Barriers and enablers identified will be mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and related strategies will be provided to guide the uptake of future patient-clinician digital health interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethics approval. The results will be presented at a scientific conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal. We will also involve relevant stakeholders to determine appropriate approaches for dissemination.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansScoping Reviews as Topichipinformation technologyquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36418125
PMCPMC9685264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.