Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418124›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Midodrine therapy for vasopressor dependent shock in the intensive care unit: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mostafa Kamaleldin, Sebastian Kilcommons, Dawn Opgenorth, Kirsten Fiest, Constantine Jason Karvellas, Jim Kutsogiannis, Vincent Lau, Erika MacIntyre, Bram Rochwerg, Janek Senaratne and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mostafa KamaleldinUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sebastian KilcommonsUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dawn OpgenorthUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3571-3871
Kirsten FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-6594
Constantine Jason KarvellasUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jim KutsogiannisUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Vincent LauUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Erika MacIntyreUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Janek SenaratneUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2320-8926
Jocelyn SlemkoUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Wendy SliglUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Xiaoming WangStatistical and Analytical Methods, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sean M BagshawUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Oleksa G RewaUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada rewa@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8718-0547
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CAImpact · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay are modified by ongoing need for haemodynamic support in critically ill patients. This is most commonly provided by intravenous vasopressor therapy. Midodrine has been used as an oral agent for haemodynamic support in patients with orthostatic hypotension or cirrhosis. However, its efficacy in treating shock in the ICU, particularly for patients weaning from intravenous vasopressors, remains uncertain. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the efficacy of midodrine in vasopressor dependent shock. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library for observational trials and randomised controlled trials evaluating midodrine in critically ill patients from inception to 21 April 2022. We will also review unpublished data and relevant conference abstracts. Outcomes will include ICU length of stay, duration of intravenous vasopressor support, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, hospital length of stay and rates of ICU readmission. Data will be analysed in aggregate, where appropriate. We will evaluate risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology. We will perform trial sequential analysis for the outcome of ICU length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-related publication and will inform future clinical trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021260375.

Indexed as

MidodrineShockCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsMeta-Analysis as TopicReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicVasoconstrictor AgentsMidodrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdult intensive & critical careINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREORAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36418124
PMCPMC9684992
OpenAlexW4309797012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.