Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418118›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Combined incentive actions, focusing on primary care professionals, to improve cervical cancer screening in women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged geographical areas: a study protocol of a hybrid cluster randomised effectiveness and implementation trial- RESISTE.

Amir Hassine, Guillemette Antoni, Muriel Fender, Katia Slama, François-Xavier Léandri, Jean-Luc Fanon, Christelle Auvray, Marie Christine Jaffar Bandjee, Nicolas Traversier, Laurence Fagour and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04312178 (Combined Incentive Actions, Focusing on Primary Care, to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Residing in Socio-economically Disadvantaged and Untracked Geographical Areas), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04312178 nacompletednot on this map

Combined Incentive Actions, Focusing on Primary Care, to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Residing in Socio-economically Disadvantaged and Untracked Geographical Areas: a Hybrid Efficacy and Implementation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled10,446ConditionsCervical CancerArmscash incentive, no intervention, return vaginal self-swab kit in person
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir HassineCIC-P INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0833-7746
Guillemette AntoniCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health INSERM UMR 1018, CESP, Villejuif, France.
Muriel FenderRegional Center for the Coordination of Cancer Screening Grand Est Region, Strasbourg, France.
Katia SlamaRegional Screening for the Coordination of Cancer Screening, Réunion, France.
François-Xavier LéandriRegional Center for the Coordination Screening of Cancer Screening PACA Region, Marseille, France.
Jean-Luc FanonRegional Centre for the Coordination of Cancer Screening Martinique Island, Martinique, France.
Christelle AuvrayLaboratory of Virology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Marie Christine Jaffar BandjeeLaboratory of Virology, CHD Félix Guyon, Saint-Denis, Réunion.
Nicolas TraversierLaboratory of Virology, CHD Félix Guyon, Saint-Denis, Réunion.
Laurence FagourLaboratory of Virology, CHU de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique.
Lise RochaixChaire de Recherche Hospinnomics, Paris School of Economics, Paris, France.
Camilla FiorinaChaire de Recherche Hospinnomics, Paris School of Economics, Paris, France.
Dolorès PouretteCEPED, Paris, France.
Eric OpigezCEPED, Paris, France.
Alexandre DumontCEPED, Research Institute for Development, Paris, France.
Marc BardouCIC-P INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France marc.bardou@u-bourgogne.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0028-1837
Resiste Study GroupRegional Center for the Coordination of Cancer Screening Grand Est Region, Strasbourg, France.
Centre Population et Développement · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique · MQInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRParis School of Economics · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer (CC) causes thousands of deaths each year. Nearly 100% of cases are caused by oncogenic strains of human papillomavirus (HPV). In most industrialised countries, CC screening (CCS) is based on the detection of HPV infections. For many reasons including lower adherence to CCS, underserved women are more likely to develop CC, and die from it. We aim to demonstrate that the use of incentives could improve screening rates among this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our cluster randomised, controlled trial will include 10 000 women aged 30-65 years eligible for CCS, living in deprived areas in four French departments, two mainlands and two overseas, and who did not perform physician-based HPV testing within the framework of the nationally organised screening programme. HPV self-sampling kit (HPVss) will be mailed to them. Two interventions are combined in a factorial analysis design ending in four arms: the possibility to receive or not a financial incentive of €20 and to send back the self-sampling by mail or to give it to a health professional, family doctor, gynaecologist, midwife or pharmacist. The main outcome is the proportion of women returning the HPVss, or doing a physician-based HPV or pap-smear test the year after receiving the HPVss. 12-month follow-up data will be collected through the French National Health Insurance database. We expect to increase the return rate of HPV self-samples by at least 10% (from 20% to 30%) compared with the postal return without economic incentive. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was first obtained on 2 April 2020, then on July 29 2022. The ethics committee classified the study as interventional with low risk, thus no formal consent is required for inclusion. The use of health insurance data was approved by the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés on 14 September 2021 (ref No 920276). An independent data security and monitoring committee was established. The main trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04312178.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMotivationPapillomaviridaePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGynaecological oncologyHealth economicsHealth policyONCOLOGYPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36418118
PMCPMC9684961
OpenAlexW4309797043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.