Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36418016›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2022

Machine learning for the prediction of preclinical airway management in injured patients: a registry-based trial.

André Luckscheiter, Wolfgang Zink, Torsten Lohs, Johanna Eisenberger, Manfred Thiel, Tim Viergutz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

André LuckscheiterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Ludwigshafen Municipal Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Wolfgang ZinkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Ludwigshafen Municipal Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Torsten LohsCenter for Quality Management in Emergency Medical Services Baden-Wuerttemberg (SQR-BW), Stuttgart, Germany.
Johanna EisenbergerCenter for Quality Management in Emergency Medical Services Baden-Wuerttemberg (SQR-BW), Stuttgart, Germany.
Manfred ThielDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Tim ViergutzClinic for Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using machine learning to establish the need for preclinical airway management for injured patients based on a standardized emergency dataset.

methodsA registry-based, retrospective analysis was conducted of adult trauma patients who were treated by physician-staffed emergency medical services in southwestern Germany between 2018 and 2020. The primary outcome was to assess the feasibility of using the random forest (RF) and Naive Bayes (NB) machine learning algorithms to predict the need for preclinical airway management. The secondary outcome was to use a principal component analysis to determine the attributes that can be used and advanced for future model development.

resultsIn total, 25,556 adults with multiple injuries were identified, including 1,451 patients (5.7%) who required airway management. Key attributes were auscultation, injury pattern, oxygen therapy, thoracic drainage, noninvasive ventilation, catecholamines, pelvic sling, colloid infusion, initial vital signs, preemergency status, and shock index. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was between 0.96 (RF; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.97) and 0.93 (NB; 95% CI, 0.92-0.93; P<0.01). For the prediction of airway management, RF yielded a higher precision-recall area than NB (0.83 [95% CI, 0.8-0.85] vs. 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.72], respectively; P<0.01).

conclusionTo predict the need for preclinical airway management in injured patients, attributes that are commonly recorded in standardized datasets can be used with machine learning. In future models, the RF algorithm could be used because it has robust prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Bayes theoremDecision treesIntratracheal intubationMachine learningWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID36418016
PMCPMC9834832
OpenAlexW4309913720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.