ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023
Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Exploring open science in applied ethology: practice and attitudes among researchers.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Implementing is necessary: the gap between discourse and practice in global open science.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
- The Use of Automated Digital Data in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: Confronting a New Ethical Landscape.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' perceptions of the synergy between intellectual property and open science: A cross-sectional survey.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- A Tutorial for Enhancing Clarity and Transparency in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Intervention Research With the TIDieR.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Conducting high-quality and reliable acoustic analysis: A tutorial focused on training research assistants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- The Effect of Open Access on Scholarly and Societal Metrics of Impact in the ASHA Journals.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Preregistration: Practical Considerations for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Swallowing outcomes in dysphagia interventions in Parkinson's disease: a scoping review.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOpen science is a collection of practices that seek to improve the accessibility, transparency, and replicability of science. Although these practices have garnered interest in related fields, it remains unclear whether open science practices have been adopted in the field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD). This study aimed to survey the knowledge, implementation, and perceived benefits and barriers of open science practices in CSD.
methodAn online survey was disseminated to researchers in the United States actively engaged in CSD research. Four-core open science practices were examined:
resultsTwo hundred twenty-two participants met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were doctoral students (38%) or assistant professors (24%) at R1 institutions (58%). Participants reported low knowledge of preregistration and gold open access. There was, however, a high level of desire to learn more for all practices. Implementation of open science practices was also low, most notably for preregistration, gold open access, and open data (< 25%). Predictors of knowledge and participation, as well as perceived barriers to implementation, are discussed.
conclusionAlthough participation in open science appears low in the field of CSD, participants expressed a strong desire to learn more in order to engage in these practices in the future. Supplemental Material and Open Science Form: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21569040.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.