Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

SARS-CoV-2 surveillance with environmental surface sampling in public areas.

Kristina Mihajlovski, Mark P Buttner, Patricia Cruz, Brian Labus, Barbara St Pierre Schneider, Elizabeth Detrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Environmental surface surveillance during a COVID-19 outbreak in a school community: implications for controlling indirect transmission.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina MihajlovskiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-8825
Mark P ButtnerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.
Patricia CruzDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.
Brian LabusDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7169-8061
Barbara St Pierre SchneiderGraduate Nursing Department, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, The University of Texas at Arlington, TX, United States of America.
Elizabeth DetrickDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contaminated surfaces are one of the ways that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be transmitted. SARS-CoV-2 can be detected on environmental surfaces; however, few environmental sampling studies have been conducted in nonclinical settings. The objective of this study was to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA on environmental surfaces in public areas in Las Vegas, Nevada. In total, 300 surface samples were collected from high-touch surfaces from high-congregate public locations and from a public health facility (PHF) that was visited by COVID-19 patients. Environmental samples were analyzed with quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using SARS-CoV-2 specific primers and probes for three target genes. Results showed that 31 out of 300 (10.3%) surface samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 24 at the PHF and 7 in high-congregate public locations. Concentrations ranged from 102 to 106 viral particles per 3 ml sample on a wide variety of materials. The data also showed that the N gene assay had greater sensitivity compared to the S and ORF gene assays. Besides frequently touched surfaces, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in restrooms, on floors and surfaces in contact with floors, as well as in a mop water sample. The results of this study describe the extent and distribution of environmental SARS-CoV-2 contamination in public areas in Las Vegas, Nevada. A method using the N gene PCR assay was developed for SARS-CoV-2 environmental monitoring in public areas. Environmental monitoring with this method can determine the specific sites of surface contamination in the community and may be beneficial for prevention of COVID-19 indirect transmission, and evaluation and improvement of infection control practices in public areas, public health facilities, universities, and businesses.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2DNA PrimersHumansRNA, ViralSpecimen HandlingDNA PrimersRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID36417446
PMCPMC9683569
OpenAlexW4309865614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.