Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417309›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the human dorsal spinal cord reveals a map of arm and hand muscle responses.

James R McIntosh, Evan F Joiner, Jacob L Goldberg, Lynda M Murray, Bushra Yasin, Anil Mendiratta, Steven C Karceski, Earl Thuet, Oleg Modik, Evgeny Shelkov and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Human Cervical Epidural Spinal Electrogram Topographically Maps Distinct Volitional Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

James R McIntoshDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-1619
Evan F JoinerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7243-8779
Jacob L GoldbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-9387
Lynda M MurrayDepartment of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-5607
Bushra YasinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2487-2789
Anil MendirattaDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-888X
Steven C KarceskiDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-5247
Earl ThuetNew York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7743-2309
Oleg ModikDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6270-413X
Evgeny ShelkovDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-6454
Joseph M LombardiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-3027
Zeeshan M SardarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-3798
Ronald A LehmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-9885
Christopher MandigoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-5205
K Daniel RiewDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-9375
Noam Y HarelDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-2194
Michael S VirkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian, Och Spine Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8511-5602
Jason B CarmelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-3692
Cornell University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USColumbia University · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Spinal Cord Associative PlasticityR01NS124224 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CARMEL, JASON BRANT, HAREL, NOAM Y. · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS124224NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although epidural stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord has emerged as a powerful modality for recovery of movement, how it should be targeted to the cervical spinal cord to activate arm and hand muscles is not well understood, particularly in humans. We sought to map muscle responses to posterior epidural cervical spinal cord stimulation in humans. We hypothesized that lateral stimulation over the dorsal root entry zone would be most effective and responses would be strongest in the muscles innervated by the stimulated segment. Twenty-six people undergoing clinically indicated cervical spine surgery consented to mapping of motor responses. During surgery, stimulation was performed in midline and lateral positions at multiple exposed segments; six arm and three leg muscles were recorded on each side of the body. Across all segments and muscles tested, lateral stimulation produced stronger muscle responses than midline despite similar latency and shape of responses. Muscles innervated at a cervical segment had the largest responses from stimulation at that segment, but responses were also observed in muscles innervated at other cervical segments and in leg muscles. The cervical responses were clustered in rostral (C4-C6) and caudal (C7-T1) cervical segments. Strong responses to lateral stimulation are likely due to the proximity of stimulation to afferent axons. Small changes in response sizes to stimulation of adjacent cervical segments argue for local circuit integration, and distant muscle responses suggest activation of long propriospinal connections. This map can help guide cervical stimulation to improve arm and hand function.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationAnimalsElectric StimulationElectromyographyForelimbHumansMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cordcervical spinal cord injuryelectrical stimulationepiduralmotor evoked potentialsmyelopathy

Identifiers

PMID36417309
PMCPMC9799146
OpenAlexW4309827378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.