Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417301›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2022

Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review.

Broghan M Erland, Andrew K Thorpe, John A Gamon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural shifts in China's oil and gas CHNature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Broghan M ErlandDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Andrew K ThorpeJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7968-5433
John A GamonDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-7723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be immediately reduced to avoid drastic increases in global temperature, methane emissions have been placed center stage in the fight against climate change. Methane has a significantly larger warming potential than carbon dioxide. A large percentage of methane emissions are in the form of industry emissions, some of which can now be readily identified and mitigated. This review considers recent advances in methane detection that allow accurate and transparent monitoring, which are needed for reducing uncertainty in source attribution and evaluating progress in emissions reductions. A particular focus is on complementary methods operating at different scales with applications for the oil and gas industry, allowing rapid detection of large point sources and addressing inconsistencies of emissions inventories. Emerging airborne and satellite imaging spectrometers are advancing our understanding and offer new top-down assessment methods to complement bottom-up methods. Successfully merging estimates across scales is vital for increased certainty regarding greenhouse gas emissions and can inform regulatory decisions. The development of comprehensive, transparent, and spatially resolved top-down and bottom-up inventories will be crucial for holding nations accountable for their climate commitments.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesMethaneBiodiversityCarbon DioxideTemperatureCarbon DioxideGreenhouse GasesMethanebottom-upmethane emissionsmonitoring technologyremote sensingspectroscopytop-down

Identifiers

PMID36417301
PMCPMC9730852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.