Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417228›Full record

ArticleEpidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Large-Scale COVID-19 Twitter Chatter Dataset for Open Scientific Research-An International Collaboration.

Juan M Banda, Ramya Tekumalla, Guanyu Wang, Jingyuan Yu, Tuo Liu, Yuning Ding, Ekaterina Artemova, Elena Tutubalina, Gerardo Chowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan M BandaDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-824X
Ramya TekumallaDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Guanyu WangMissouri School of Journalism, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA.
Jingyuan YuDepartment of Social Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9400-4859
Tuo LiuDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-7809
Yuning DingLanguage Technology Lab, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.
Ekaterina ArtemovaFaculty of Computer Science, Higher School of Economics-National Research University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Elena TutubalinaFaculty of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7936-0284
Gerardo ChowellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread worldwide, an unprecedented amount of open data is being generated for medical, genetics, and epidemiological research. The unparalleled rate at which many research groups around the world are releasing data and publications on the ongoing pandemic is allowing other scientists to learn from local experiences and data generated on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a need to integrate additional data sources that map and measure the role of social dynamics of such a unique worldwide event in biomedical, biological, and epidemiological analyses. For this purpose, we present a large-scale curated dataset of over 1.12 billion tweets, growing daily, related to COVID-19 chatter generated from 1 January 2020 to 27 June 2021 at the time of writing. This data source provides a freely available additional data source for researchers worldwide to conduct a wide and diverse number of research projects, such as epidemiological analyses, emotional and mental responses to social distancing measures, the identification of sources of misinformation, stratified measurement of sentiment towards the pandemic in near real time, among many others.

Indexed as

COVID-19data sourcesopen sciencepublic datasetssocial media

Identifiers

PMID36417228
PMCPMC9620940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.