Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36417131›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2022

Computed tomography in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging predictors of hematoma expansion and outcome.

Amir Hillal, Teresa Ullberg, Birgitta Ramgren, Johan Wassélius

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir HillalDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Teresa UllbergDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Birgitta RamgrenDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Johan WasséliusDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. johan.wasselius@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-381X
Lund University · SE

Funding

Crafoordska Stiftelsen 20200548VINNOVA 2020-04841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10-20% of all strokes worldwide and is associated with serious outcomes, including a 30-day mortality rate of up to 40%. Neuroimaging is pivotal in diagnosing ICH as early detection and determination of underlying cause, and risk for expansion/rebleeding is essential in providing the correct treatment. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the most used modality for detection of ICH, identification of prognostic markers and measurements of hematoma volume, all of which are of major importance to predict outcome. The strongest predictors of 30-day mortality and functional outcome for ICH patients are baseline hematoma volume and hematoma expansion. Even so, exact hematoma measurement is rare in clinical routine practice, primarily due to a lack of tools available for fast, effective, and reliable volumetric tools. In this educational review, we discuss neuroimaging findings for ICH from NCCT images, and their prognostic value, as well as the use of semi-automatic and fully automated hematoma volumetric methods and assessment of hematoma expansion in prognostic studies.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyImagingIntracerebral hemorrhageOutcome prognosticationVolumetric measurement

Identifiers

PMID36417131
PMCPMC9684397
OpenAlexW4309701368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.